Philosophy and the Law of Torts

177710 Words711 Pages
This page intentionally left blank Philosophy and the Law of Torts When accidents occur and people suffer injuries, who ought to bear the loss? Tort law offers a complex set of rules to answer this question, but until now philosophers have offered little by way of analysis of these rules. In eight essays commissioned for this volume, leading legal theorists examine the philosophical foundations of tort law. Among the questions they address are the following: How are the notions at the core of tort practice (such as responsibility, fault, negligence, due care, and duty to repair) to be understood? Is an explanation based on a conception of justice feasible? How are concerns of distributive and corrective justice related? What amounts to an adequate explanation of tort law? This collection will be of interest to professionals and advanced students working in philosophy of law, social theory, political theory, and law, as well as anyone seeking a better understanding of tort law. Gerald J. Postema is Cary C. Boshamer Professor of Philosophy and Professor of Law at The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He is the author of Bentham and the Common Law Tradition (1986) and the editor of Jeremy Bentham: Moral and Legal Philosophy (2001) and Racism and the Law: The Legacy and Lessons of Plessy (1997). Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Law GENERAL EDITOR: GERALD POSTEMA (UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA, CHAPEL HILL) ADVISORY BOARD Jules Coleman (Yale Law School) Antony Duff (University of Stirling) David Lyons (Boston University) Neil MacCormick (University of Edinburgh) Stephen R. Munzer (U.C.L.A. Law School) Phillip Pettit (Australian National University) Joseph Raz (University of Oxford) Jeremy Waldron (Columbia Law School) Some other books in the series: Stephen R. Munzer: A Theory of Property R. G. Frey and Christopher W. Morris (eds.): Liability
Open Document