They will work as a team and solve the tasks at hand. As the saying goes, “two heads are better than one.” Bringing together two people makes way for opportunities at solving problems in different ways then one person would solve alone. Also having two people, preferably with different experience will also bring forth different problem-solving and policing tactics. Safety appears to be increased when an officer is with a partner. This may just be a “sense” of safety, but officers like to think their partner has their back.
Weapons should be easy to assemble and not rely heavily on a finite external supply to support their use, such as guns. Easier and more ideal weapons can include knives, machetes, baseball bats, crowbars, and a wide range of other melee weapons to choose from. Melee weapons are also ideal because they are quieter to use, considering zombies are drawn to loud noises. Make sure each member of the team has a weapon that is most usable to that person. It can be counter-productive, as well as life-threatening, to leave a dangerous weapon in the hands of an inexperienced
A benefit of a nation without guns would be that we would turn into a nation of great runners. What does she think… that guns are a contributing factor in the nation’s obesity problem? The general safety of having guns around is a big issue that is brought up. Yes, people do not usually accidently kill themselves while cleaning their knives as is sometimes the case with guns. Knives, when used in a fight, seldom kill another person besides the intended victim as well.
These certain people also call for a great amount of street smarts to go along with their professionalism. 3. What I thought of the officers giving each other plaques for shooting or wounding suspects is that it is a wrong thing to do. As a cop you never want to have to kill or shoot someone, but when you do it should not be a rewarding feeling. 4.
POLS 107 Project 1 – Comparison Chart |Topics |Go-Getters |Democrat Party | |Gun Control | |Democrats support the right to bear arms, for| | |We as a people have to protect ourselves. Everyone does|all people, not just militia. | | |not have good intentions, and for this reason we need | | | |to be able to own a gun. We need to be able to protect | | | |ourselves from any dangers that may arise. | | | | | | |Education | |They support learning and in second chance | | |Education can carry a person a long way.
I also agree that hunters should be allowed to have weapons, but there is a big difference between semi-automatic and a rifle that hunters use. If we had greater control, we could save many innocent people. Guns were made for the war as a source of protection. However that is not the only thing
If we are truly concerned about our safety, our right and our duty to protect ourselvesand all that we love and stand for, then we must be able to own and knowledgeably operate the kinds of firearms that will allow us to do just that. Admittedly, there is the growing concern with regard to assault weapons getting into the hands of non law abiding persons (criminals and drug dealers). However, we must be confident that with better regulations with regards to ownership of assault weapons and with better enforcement of these regulations we can keep assault weapons out of the hands of those who intend to use them to harm others. When every assault weapon is banned, the only ones left with guns are the criminals. WORKS CITED Robertson v. Baldwin, 165 U.S. 275 (1897) United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939) District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570
If more people know the pros and cons of the facts about firearms, they will reconsider their opinion on not only the possession of a firearm, but its usage as well. This brings up the topic of concealed carry. The official definition of “concealed carry” is the practice of carrying a weapon in public in a concealed manner. (Either on one’s person or in close proximity.) Although this does pose a security threat, it would be the solution to many of the crimes that are committed.
On the contrary, most people own guns for hunting, target shooting, and protection. It is true that there are not many cases of people actually protecting themselves with guns, but "defensive gun use (DGU) is relatively common, that even a diehard gun control advocate with any principles and common sense would admit that this fact must be given some weight" (How Often Do We...). Owning a gun can make people feel safer and that should not be deprived. Guns are always
In the public services, these types of leaderships will be used within different circumstances, authoritarian is best in urgent situations but laissez-faire is better for those who are experts and know exactly what they are doing and don't depend on a leader, they are similar because they both focus on the task in hand but one is directed every step by a demanding leader, sometimes, authoritarian could be bad style to use as it could make the other team members feel under pressure and lack motivation but leading in a laissez-faire manner will make the members feel more important because they have freedom to work the way they feel best. If there was to be a car accident, authoritarian would be a better approach because whether it was ambulance, police or fire, they will need to get the victims to hospital and road cleared as quickly as possible but it'd take longer if the team didn't know what their roles were and what they were