Paths of Glory

909 Words4 Pages
Paths of Glory, filmed in 1957 and directed by Stanley Kubrick, is a classic antiwar film which demonstrates a carefully crafted masterpiece of visual composition. It depicts a military hierarchy of France during World War I; a bureaucracy that will turn on their own men to maintain their personal state of power. The film mainly follows Colonel Dax, a unit commander in the French army who must deal with the mutiny of his men and the glory-seeking General Mireau after his force falls back under fire in an impossible attack. Specifically, the attack scene, “Go on the Whistle,” takes place on a battlefield known as “the Ant Hill” against an unseen German enemy. It was loosely based on the historical French stronghold in 1916, during the Battle of Verdun, which Kubrick critically judges and successfully emphasizes the gap between those in authority and those under it. The visual effects and camera operation, in particular, are what make the audience feel involved in the conspiracy of war and forget the low-budget Kubrick had to work with. The question is; why does the camera positioning and editing add to the composition of “Go on the Whistle” in Paths of Glory? Some would argue that the effect of diegetic and non-diegetic sound visually represent Kubrick’s efforts in suggesting the film’s irony of blending shown and implied opposition.1 This theory however does not support the idea of camera position effecting visual composition. Therefore, the camera positioning and editing of the “Go on the Whistle” scene augments the point of view and overall visual stimulation of the film. Point of View is displayed through successful camera editing which illustrate the inner concerns of the major characters. The scene begins in the Trenches with a steady Forward Tracking shot. It strides through the center of the soldiers pressed against the sides of the narrow trench,
Open Document