This document was published with the intention of gathering responses from professionals in the field of youth work. The first page of Ethical Conduct in Youth Work is entitled ‘Background’ and briefly discusses how opinions were collected and the general consensus of the feedback. The paper then goes on to outline the purpose of the document and suggests how it should best be used: ‘its aim is primarily to develop ethical awareness and to encourage reflection as the basis for ethical conduct rather than to tell youth workers exactly how to act in particular cases.’ The National Youth Agency (2004). The rest of the document is then split into five sections, the first four sections reflect on the purpose and nature of youth work and also the importance of ethics. In section 1 the document describes the purpose of youth work and then moves on to list the qualities recognised within youth work, based on Davies (1996).
It must also be accepted by the scientific community. 3. What document offers an alternative to the Frye standard that some courts believe espouses a more flexible standard for admitting scientific evidence? The document would be The Daubert Case. It must be scientifically tested by the peers and the peers must also review it.
1. Identify standards that influence the way the role is carried out. There are many standards that are put there to ensure that my role is carried out well. This may include codes of practice, national occupational standards, minimum standards and regulations. Having this in place ensure that there are guidelines to my role of what must and must not be done it is important to obey by these to ensure the job is done properly.
Simply allowing each party to express their issues and how to resolve it and then finding a middle ground to resolve the situation. In some individual cases with staff, Supervisions or assessments are required to gain more information. With agencies, data collection is vital to agreeing terms, if it is proven that a certain way of working or regulations works then it is hard to argue with conflicting evidence in the benefit of the disagreement. 3.4 – Demonstrate methods of assessing the effectiveness of joint working
1.Understand own role and responsibilities in lifelong learning. 1.1 Summarise key aspects of legislation, regulatory requirements and codes of practice relating to own role and responsibilities. Legislation requires us to act according to the law set by an Act of Parliament. This is a legal requirement and any breaches of any such act can result in court action. A Code of Practice or sometimes known as Code of Conduct, is one which has been set by an employer, to ensure the correct behaviour of employees and that company procedures are followed.
3 Understand techniques and criteria for monitoring the quality of assessment Internally - (Professional discussion to be based on this Essay) 3.1 Evaluate different techniques for sampling evidence of assessment, including use of technology: There are different techniques for sampling the evidence of learners work such as the vertical sampling (identical elements from different assessors and horizontal sampling which means that a specific piece of all units over the course of time is checked very carefully for validity, consistency and so forth,. This would include liaising with and interviewing assessors, reviewing their practical views on specific areas to tutoring to obtain evidence that match up with unit/element criteria, including witness statements; scrutinising their records whether they are paper based or electronically stored. I would also take the opportunity to observe good working practice and if need be consult any witnesses, for example; with regards to my work as an IV at Bradford College I would implement the above techniques for sampling evidence. With respect to this, there are a number of factors to be taken into consideration, such as the type of evidence, i.e., what format it is in, how many learners there are in the current cohort for example and which is then also dependent on the experience of the assessors and whether they are qualified or not to carry out the job effectively and efficiently and adhering to the organisation awarding body strategies, policies and procedures, all within realistic timeframes. I understand that other than the availability of a hard copy of evidence if required by the IQA staff/team, there is another more modern way of sampling using technology such as Moodle is basically a virtual delivery environment which means that candidate/learners can receive tasks and information so that they can
We could bring up the case as a sample to demonstrate what we are discussing about. However, adding a question to prove our point is not recommended in academic writing. The subject line information to identify the situation has to be included on the head of the memo. In addition, clarity, correctness, and courtesy are very important and they represent for our efforts. The memo should be clearly written and organized in direct order, beginning with the objective and then systematically and covering the vital bits of information (Rentz, 2008).
1. The control process assumes that ________. A. employees require clear directions from management B. employees are underqualified and require training C. specific goals for performance were already created during the planning process D. employee monitoring costs are part and parcel of doing business The correct answer is: C. Because the control process measures actual performance against standards, these standards should already be in place when the control process begins. If standards are not created during the planning process, the control process will not have a goal against which to measure actual performance. 2.
The statement of fact must be supported by a statement of relevance. Statement of relevance is the supporting evidence for a statement of fact that justifies its validity or truth. After the plaintiff presents its claim, the defendant has the opportunity to dispute or acknowledge the plaintiff’s claim. This process is repeated until all claims have been resolved and brought before the court. The World Court then makes a judgment based on the evidence and facts presented.
Do they automatically become useless? We gain knowledge through sense perception, reason, language and emotion. Every one of these determinants can be influenced by personal background, feelings, incomplete methods of reasoning and so on. As definition of knowledge is justified true belief, to accept something as knowledge, i.e. to claim to know it, statement must be considered true (objective), one must believe it (subjective) and there must be justification why the person knows it – way of knowing.