In the book, Gary talks about how his television images motivates him to have a way out of Fresno and it kept him fighting to find away out of poverty. He fought for a place where he can plan his roots and be accepted for who is. Gary also had many family conflicts but the biggest one was with his step dad. Gary’s lack of education and being mistreated in school made him think that his future was going to be living in Fresno the rest of his life like his parents did. Gary wants to break away from poverty and keep the next generation out of working in the fields or factories.
Lastly, his last dilemma is he has a hard time deciding wether or not he is going to help Daisy when she finds out about Tom. Those are only a few of the dilemmas that Nick faced. I came up with a self improvement plan though to help Nick out with his every day struggles that he faces in his new town. I think that Nick has been over-stressing himself. What Nick needs to realize though is that all of the peer pressure that is going on should not bother him, he shouldn't let it ruin his focus on his work.
In Re Gault 387 U.S. 1 (1967) Prior History of the Case in the Lower Courts Fifteen year old Gerald Gault was heard on charges of making “lewd telephone calls .After a hearing by a juvenile court in Arizona and sentenced as a juvenile delinquent to the State Industrial School he appealed his case to the state court, challenged the constitutionality of the Arizona Juvenile Code concerning habeas corpus and procedure. The Supreme Court of Arizona affirmed dismissal of the writ stating that Gault’s due process rights were not offended by the procedures. The case was then appealed to the United States Supreme Court. Facts of the Case Gerald Gault and Ronald Lewis were taken into custody. Gerald was still on a six month probation order from being in the company of a boy who had stolen a wallet from a lady’s purse.
A motion to suppress the identification was denied at trial, and the petitioner and his companion were convicted for the robbery. Issue Whether the sixth and fourteenth amendment rights to counsel should be applied to identification testimony based upon a police station show up that took place before the defendant had been indicted or charged with any criminal offense? Holding Judgement Affirmed Rationale In United States v. Wade and Gilbert v. California, the court had held that at a post indictment pretrial lineup, the defendants have the right to the presence of their attorneys. The court held that since the defendant in this case was not formally charged with a crime when the identification process took place, the rulings of Wade and Gilbert do not apply here. The court ruled that the defendant had no right to the presence
The officer then spun Terry around while patting him down and found a weapon. Terry tried to get the weapon dropped due to illegal search and seizure but was denied due to the fact that an officer is justified in conducting a brief search of a person whom is found to be potentially dangerous. Before an officer can interrogate a person according to the sixth amendment, they must be told the right to a counsel. This comes about after the Gideon v Wainwright case in 1961. A burglary had occurred at a pool lounge.
. BUCHANAN-SALLY HEARSAY/NONHEARSAY Hearsay An out of court statement offered for evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted. Here, Buchannan, and agent in the DEA, will testify that he spoke with Sally, whose son overdosed on cocaine. The facts do not directly indicate if Sally’s son received his cocaine from Danforth. However, Sally’s reaction of fainting when she saw the photograph of Danforth can be inferred that she recognized the Defendant, Danforth, who sold the drugs to her son who overdosed.
Stephenie Stevenson Christine Warrington ENG 202 NA 5 November 2013 The story Metamorphosis, demonstrates how we allow every day life to over take us to the point that we change into something that we are unable to identify. Gregror did everything for everyone, but nothing for himself. He didn’t enjoy life because he was too busy working at a job that he hated in order to pay off his parents debts and to take care of the household; while they did nothing to help or to show him any appreciation. This story also show how one can give their all and when they are in need of help those that he or she helped along the way will turn their backs with no regard to you. While I was reading, “Metamorphosis”, it made me view life in a different way, and made me come to a decision of taking time out for myself in order to enjoy every essence of being me, and not neglect myself.
The reason being, she noticed other children, a little more aged, speaking about subjects such as sex in front of them. Irene thinks she can insure her sons a happy childhood by keeping "the race problem" hidden from them. However the huband opposes her idea of restraining the children from these facts. Brian asks," 'What was the use of our trying to keep them from learning the word 'nigger' and its connotation? They found out, didn't they?
For example, he says to Dick he killed a ‘Negro’ called King with a bicycle chain, which isn’t true (see page 112). Then, Perry does not want to go in the house and kill the Clutters with Dick, but does not want Dick seeing him as a coward (see page 235). Also as a child, he was very sensitive. For Dick, killing represented easy money, or steeling without witnesses. For example, he first started steeling in small place like supermarkets event if he had money,, then, it trills him to kill, he was expecting from six to twelve person in the Clutters’ house (see page 234), and as he repeats over and over, no witnesses (see page 233).
Supreme Court addressed the fundamental fairness of the juvenile court process in Kent v. United States. Morris Kent, Jr., a 14 year old was apprehended in 1959 and charged with several house burglaries, and attempted purse snatching and was later released into the custody of his mother and placed on probation. Two years later an intruder broke into a woman’s apartment, stole her wallet, and raped her. Fingerprints at the crime scene matched the ones on file for Morris Kent, Jr. 16 years old at the time -- was taken into custody, where he volunteered information regarding the burglary, robberies, and rape. While in custody, Kent’s mother retained counsel on his behalf, during which time psychological and psychiatric evaluations conducted on Kent had deemed him a “victim of psychopathology.” The court ruled that Kent appear before an adult court system -- where he was tried as an adult; charged with six counts of burglary and robbery; and sentenced to 5 – 15 year for each