In response to Nora’s shock at his unexpected appearance, Krogstad should act calmly, when delivering the line “Excuse me, the outer door was ajar: I suppose someone forgot to shut it” so that the difference between the two’s feelings are shown, Nora is scared and shocked whilst Krogstad is calm and unnerved. To show his scheming nature, i would deliver this line quietly and slowly with his movement and tone of voice completely calm, stressing the word “forgot” and smiling as he says this word, to suggest that the door was not open and he opened it. Krogstad’s posture should be firm and straight, staring straight into Nora’s eyes, both his posture and eye contact should be intimidating. Krogstad’s apparent interest in Mrs Linde, shows his scheming nature, he is only asking after her because he wants to know if it is she that has take his job. “May i make so bold as to ask if it was a Mrs. Linde?”, when delivering this line I would speak confidently, in a strong and steady voice.
– Allusion Scene X: Montag asks why they trust him and they say because the way he looks. Montag doesn’t see the glow of knowledge in their face like he thought he would. “quoting the Magna Charta and the Constitution” -
Gladwell stated what he wanted the readers to get out from his book and what we were expecting. Also, while at the same time Gladwell is persuading the readers to think the way he does. When I read this passage, my first initial thoughts were that learning how to control my judgments and first impressions is impossible. To me the statement, “be in control of your judgments” means the same as the statement, “I have control of my own heart beat,” which is impossible. My judgments are my own and it’s unique.
Do not slouching or standing still, because it shows insecurity and lack of credibility. In addition, make sure pronounce all words correctly. When the speaker falters or stumbles over his words, audiences become distracted and their attention to the message being delivered falters. Also, give evidence to supports the speech. The speaker can begin a speech by iterating the qualifications and expertise or listing his previous experience in dealing with the topic being discussed.
Occasionally, despite a counselor’s best efforts, some clients fail to act in their best interests and negatively respond to all counseling interventions. These clients are often called oppositional, reactionary, noncompliant, intractable, and unmotivated (Dowd, 1989). You can not make someone tell you something they do not want to. Forcing an issue or trying to push a client into telling you something will only make them want to be more reluctant from sharing. Being understanding, empathic, and listening to the client helps build the relationship and give the client the opportunity to want to trust you enough to tell you what you need to know.
This is how Emerson sees consistency; he is very much against it and looks down upon those who do not change their minds. Honesty has a lot to do with the consistency part of Emerson’s piece. Many people may be afraid to be inconsistent because they fear others will fear they are being dishonest. They have an opinion on something one day, and then the next it is changed. Some can see this as being dishonest and many people in society fear this.
In many cases when people are having a conversation, one person will receive a text, read it, and then reply. When this takes place the other person in the conversation gets the impression that what they have to say is not important. In the study one participant stated that she knows that texting while engaging in a face-to-face conversation is rude, but that is her way of letting them know she is uninterested in what they are talking about. So it is proven that it is a way of letting people know you do not care what they have to say, so whether that is your point of doing it or not, that is how it will come off. When talking to a friend, family member, or significant other do not give them the inkling that the conversation is insignificant or it could cause them to be
Yet I would not expect someone that isn’t as close to me to immediately grasp what it is I am trying to get across. Taking the description and details out only because it is someone close to me puts a strain on our relationship at times. My frustration and annoyance that I am still being asked to help when I briefly stated I wanted me to take over starts an argument. Being clear in communication could avoid future arguments. After reading this article I see that no matter how long you know someone or how close you are to them the communication needs to be clear.
“Mr Ross, I am your bodyguard” I replied. I was very nervous at what he was going to say next… Is he going to think that it’s a stupid idea... is he going to tell me to go away and stop being stupid? “My what?” he said clearly startled by my statement. “I want to be your body guard. I mean you’re the leader, Mr Ross; I can’t let anything happen to you.” I could just tell he was going to say no.
He is convinced this is the route he wants to take. The counselor listens carefully to what the client has to say, asks appropriate questions and engages in a clinically appropriate discussion. The counselor informs the client that although she is happy to continue working with him, she does not believe reparative/conversion therapy is effective and no empirical support exists for the approach. She further states that this form of therapy can actually be harmful to clients, so she will not offer this as a treatment. The client says he is disappointed that the counselor will not honor his wishes.