MEMORANDUM To: Professor Meegan Zickus From: Sylvia Y. Thomas Date: December 14, 2013 RE: Unemployment Compensation Claim for Natalie Attired. [STATEMENT OF FACTS] Natalie Attired filed for unemployment compensation in July 2010, and was denied benefits by the New Mexico Employment Security Board. She was terminated on the grounds of exhibiting the behavior of “misconduct”. Ms. Attired worked for Biddy’s Tea House for about three months.
Her doctors confirmed that these medical problems resulted in her being totally disable. Broadspire's (third party company) physicians that represented Eaton reviewed Ms. Evans 2003 records and concluded that she was no longer fully disabled. Ms. Evans was also administered an Evaluation, which concluded that she was capable of performing daily house hold duties, as well as her job in light category of work in an 8 hour period. Later that year, Ms. Evans was sent a benefits cancellation letter from the Broadspire Company. The district court decided in Ms. Evans favors even though both sides had present strong arguments to support their cases.
After Johnson consulted his supervisor, he hired his first choice, Patti Cruikshank. Zippittelli was convinced her age was the reason for her lack of success of getting the position within the company. Zippittelli had a brief conversation with her supervisor, Anita Benko, about why she felt she was going to be overlooked for the position. Zippittelli told Benko she felt because she was 63 that she was going to be overlooked for the position. Benko made the statement that she would “probably not” get the position (Twomey, (2013), p. 537).
Week 3 Case Study: Huber v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. HRMG 5700 – Employment Law Week 3 Case Study: Huber v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Pam Huber, while working for Wal-Mart as dry grocery order filler, sustained a permanent injury to her right arm and hand and could no longer perform the essential job functions. When she asked to be reassigned to a router position as a reasonable accommodation, she was required to compete with other applicants for this position, and after not being hired for this position and being placed in a maintenance position she filed suit under the ADA. Wal-Mart filed a motion for summary judgment, contending that it had a legitimate nondiscriminatory policy of hiring the most qualified applicant for all job vacancies and therefore was not required to reassign Huber to the router position. Huber filed a cross-motion for summary judgment, which the district court granted Huber’s motion and Wal-Mart appealed. The issue before the court was whether “an employer has an obligation to reassign a qualified disabled employee to a vacant equivalent position when the employer has an already established policy to hire or promote the most qualified to the position” (Twomey, 2013, p. 566).
Ryan LaMar MGMT597 – Course Project Case #47.6 This case involves a lawsuit between Marsha Hamilton and Andrea Morris. Hamilton is the plaintiff in this case and Morris is the defendant. Hamilton is suing Morris for damages because Morris misplaced Hamilton’s watch. Both parties seem as though they may have had a few too many alcoholic beverages at the party since Hamilton had to use the bathroom because she began feeling sick and Morris can’t recall what she did with the watch. The consumption of alcoholic beverages shouldn’t have any bearing toward who wins this case, but it is something to note.
Steinbeck presents Curley’s wife as nameless throughout the novella this presents her as Curley’s possession. By presenting us with one female character Steinbeck is indicating there is no real place for a woman on the ranch. Also, I think he reflects the history of women in the Great Depression onto Curley’s wife, how woman were considered inferior to men. Before George has met Curley’s wife Candy begins to tell George about her: “only been two weeks and she’s already got the eye.” ‘Eye’ signifies to us that she is unfaithful to her husband as she finds other men attractive, this makes the reader disapprove of her. Steinbeck makes us feel dislike by manipulating us into think she’s seeking attention inappropriately.
The second case was also carried out by CQC in regards to the closure of the home due to abuse in Merok park housing home in November and December 2014. First case. In February 2011 Julie Hayden was informed one of her staff had stolen £40 from a service user. The safeguarding procedure for Hounslow's social workers are expected to fill in the appropriate documentation and report the missing money within 24 hours. This is the practice that she did not follow, on more than one occasion.
1) Gerald admits to the affair with Daisy, and he even shows great compassion for his mistress. Unfortunately, he refuses to take any kind of repsonsibility for his part in her death. 2) Mrs. Birling is a prominent member of the Brumley Women’s Charity Organization, to which, it seems, Eva Smith turned for help only two weeks ago. The girl assumed the name “Mrs. Birling” at the meeting, to which Sybil Birling took immediate offense.
After the original release of “The Yellow Wallpaper” in The New England Magazine in 1891, her intent and purpose for writing this story was called into question. Several physicians protested it and claimed that it would drive people mad just from reading it. Gilman set out to explain her reasoning by describing her own experience with a doctor during her treatment for a nervous disorder. The doctor told her to life a domestic life in which she had some sort of mental stimulation two hours a day but “to never touch pen, brush or pencil ever again.” (Qtd. In Gilman.
The three girls do not represent conformity and Sammy would like to be like them. The customers are stunned as the girls make their way through the store, prompting the manager Mr. Lengel to speak to the girls about their attire “Girls this isn’t the beach” (Updike, 222). Lengel told the girls they needed to be properly dressed when they came to the store and Sammy views this as an attack on nonconformity. Sammy decides to quit his “He’s been a friend of my parents for years.” (Updike, 223) Sammy is wondering what his parents would think about him quitting. “….I felt how hard the world was going to be to me hereafter, Sammy knew he made a decision that he has to deal with but he stood up to it showing a sign of