Jessica dunn Was napoleon a strong leader? Napoleon was a strong leader in some ways and in others he was not. By strong leader I mean motivated, successful and was well liked at when he first started out as a leader. Napoleon was strong because he was determined and very motivated; he was an artillery officer and received top education and training. Napoleon had a phenomenal memory which helped him become a successful general.
Do you agree with the view that, as far as strategy and tactics were concerned, Haig and his generals were ‘pretty good’? Use sources 6 and 7 and your own knowledge. Sir Douglas Haig was regarded as one of the most significant generals during the First World War. He faced a number of problems that were difficult to overcome, but his strategies and tactics helped him to get through them, and soon enough he created the most sophisticated and massive artillery corps that was to crack the German lines. Despite Haig’s successes, he had a fair bit of opposition against him.
After the French Revolution completely changed the French society, people wanted a strong leader that will lead their country. Of all the powerful people that had the potential. Napoleon is chosen for being a strong military leader with strategy that enabled France to become a prosperous empire that dominated its surrounding countries. Among the rulers that once ruled France, Napoleon is a hero for making the country peaceful and successful. He surrendered his personal life to accomplish goals that will improve his country.
After reading The Killer Angels I am now more open to history as a subject and the literature that comes along with it. To read about how unexpected the battle actually was and how all of the commanding officers acted and felt amazed me. Michael Shaara put together the facts in such a way that made the novel not only readable but captivating to the reader, making me not want to put the book down. There were many mistakes on the confederate side which is what, I believe cause the union victory but, many men fought and died for what they believed in and that courage make them all victors in their own way. Although the civil war was not won that day, it was one of the deciding factors that eventually lead to the union victory and the freeing of the slaves, which would have most likely not have been accomplished if not for the men on that battlefield.
However, the most accurate assessment of Bonaparte’s intentions as leader most probably lies somewhere in between these two views. He was undoubtedly ruthlessly ambitious, but nevertheless, as an autocratic leader, made his own ambitions and desires synonymous with those of France and its people. Tulard (C) is no doubt the most forceful in claiming that the personal benefits which arose from making France a more stable, and thus more prosperous country, had always been Napoleon’s primary motivation from the very outset. However, a number of flaws in his argument are apparent, particularly the fact that he neglects to consider the desires of the French population; a strong government capable of restoring much needed political and
Others disagree, saying he didn’t think of the bigger picture for the country when going to war. He is seen as a great military leader due to his winning campaign against Denmark-Norway in 1700. This is because Denmark-Norway was a major power in the Baltic at the time, and Charles did not take long to force the country into peace. Also, the fact that Charles was 18/19 when he defeated Denmark-Norway makes him more of genius as he did it so young. Another reason for him being a military genius is his tactics.
America Essay How many countries have won as many wars as the United States? Who has fought harder for freedom than North America? My answer would be nobody; America is still the best country. Our nation has the most fit and determined military, we have invented many important technologies, and other countries envy the freedom of America. America has won nearly every war that we’ve been involved it.
Stephen Nelson Juneau Bibliography Paper HIST 445 Professor Jason Eden General George S. Patton: A Man Made for War General George S. Patton is arguably one of the most polarizing figures in both American and modern military history. While being one of the most decorated individuals to ever wear the uniform, he was also the center of a rather generous amount of controversy on and off the battlefield. While fellow officers respected him for his tactical knowledge, he was also despised for much of his behavior and leadership style. Yet, beyond the controversy, his soldiers adored him, because he led them to victory. His ability to utilize technology and to understand the capabilities of both his own forces and the enemy enhanced our military’s ability to maneuver decisively and achieve key victories.
He was also a more heroic leader than either Hannibal of Julius Caesar, due to their vicious and uninspired tactics. Alexander the Great was by far the most heroic and event-making individual of his time and was unparalleled in his achievements. Alexander was an established military leader who achieved many conquests during his time in power. He was