Outline and Evaluate the Learning Theory as an Explanation of Attachment

401 Words2 Pages
The learning theory was put forward by behavioural psychologists. The basic principle is that all behaviour is learnt as a result of either classical or operant conditioning. Classical conditioning involves primary drives such as hunger and thirst and involves associating naturally occurring reactions, known as reflexes [e.g. sucking] with conditioned response e.g. pleasure. On the other hand, operant conditioning involves secondary drives e.g. reinforcement of mother providing food-association, smiling and close contact with the reward of food. The learning theory attempts to explain attachment in terms of food and is known as a ‘cupboard love theory of attachment’. However other theories e.g. evolutionary see attachment as an instinctive drive and as an innate process. There is also Social learning theory, which is an extension of the learning theory (SLT). This is similar in some respects to the learning theory, in that both emphasise the role of reinforcement. However, SLT emphasises the role of imitation. We watch others and if they are rewarded for their behaviour, we are likely to copy it ourselves. One valid point for the learning theory is that we do learn therough reinforcement and association. Pavlov’s dog experiment found that dogs were not only responding to a biological need (hunger), but also a need developed by learning. He called this classical conditioning. Therefore, this gives the learning theory validity that such aspects occur for attachment. However, food may not be the only reinforce. Harlow found that the infant monkeys spent their time clinging to their cloth mother, even though there was no nourishment to be gained from her. He concluded that the monkeys have an innate (unlearned) need for contact comfort. This goes against the point that it’s just about food. This theory also did not consider that there are other factors of attachment.
Open Document