Oudor Of Chrysanthemums

646 Words3 Pages
"Odour of Chrysanthemums" by D. H. Lawrence and "A Rose for Emily" by William Faulkner are two stories that both depict struggling women in very male dominated worlds, yet these authors narrative approach differ. While in the story “A Rose for Emily,” the narrator depicts women very opposite from the way the narrator in “Odour of Chrysanthemums” illustrates the women in the story. Women are often marginalized and readers are poured with biased statements the narrator makes in “A Rose for Emily”, whereas in “Odour of Chrysanthemums” the women are given dialog and are seen as important. One constant that remains, is the differing feministic approach each narrator takes. In “A Rose for Emily” the narrator has an obvious bias against women. “Only a man of Colonel Sartoris’ generation and thought could have invented it, and only a woman could have believed it.” (par. 3). This bias is a vivid contrast separating the narrative approach in both stories. The narrator in “A Rose for Emily” doesn’t waste any time when illustrating a bias or marginalizing characters. In “Odour of Chrysanthemums the narrator illustrates no bias against women and illustrates the characters normally. Emily is given little dialog in the story, yet the story is consumed by her persona. It is clear that the narrator in “A Rose for Emily” wants readers to be on his side of the story, rather than see the story from a third person point of view. While the narrator in “A Rose for Emily” wants readers to hear his bias against women, in “Odour of Chrysanthemums” the narrator approaches readers with a more sympathetic element. From the beginning, readers are told that Elizabeth is too good for the life she is living. The narrator describes the life she lives and her surroundings in an unattractive manner. “The fields were dreary and forsaken, and in the marshy strip that led to the whimsy, a reedy
Open Document