Organisational Behaviour Argumentative Essay

3200 Words13 Pages
Introduction In the 1940s, Organizational Behavior assists functionally at three tiers of organizational which are philosophies, theories and practices. Like many different tools, Organizational Behavior has always been worked this way as a discipline. However, there are many new ideas appear and an argument is created by this between those with new ideas and those already entrenched in the discipline. The recent attack on emergent by Hackman evoking a strong counter-attack by Luthans and Avolio, followed by the likes of Davis striking at the very core of Hackman and Oldham’s Job Characteristic model and a re-visit of the model by Kilduff and Brass is an ideal example for this issue. We cannot say that the old model is not good or not accurate since OB has always worked by using those theories from the past. However, the world has changed as well as the workplace relations. Therefore, the old model may need to be replaced by the more recent one to be suitable to use at workplace. This essay studies the theories and models of Positive OB by Hackman and those already entrenched in the discipline, as well as the new ideas and future of OB by Luthans and Avolio; and how they impacts to the practice of Organizational Behavior. As both of them contain different viewpoints and values by different professors, a study of what their ideas and theories are and how they apply this to the practice of OB may give is an overview of the future of OB and how it should be. Furthermore, this essay also examines how people practice those theories in workplace; Therefore, shows the evidences to proves that the old model of OB that use the theories within discipline should be replace by a newer one. Prior to the main discussion of the essay, we will briefly review the old theories by Hackman and the new ideas by Luthan and Avolio at three tiers of organizational which are

More about Organisational Behaviour Argumentative Essay

Open Document