Organically Grown Food Versus Conventionally Grown

757 Words4 Pages
Organically Grown Food versus Conventionally Grown Food Is organic food healthier than conventional food? Is it worth the strain in your wallet? Organic food may be healthier for you but is not worth the cost when there is not any substantial evidence that the organic manufacturers meet The U.S. Department of Agriculture (U.S.D.A.) standards. Those standards, which must be met in order for food to be labeled “U.S.D.A. organic,” are fine, but they still fall short of the dreams of early organic farmers of producing the most nutritious food possible in the most ecological way.(Mark Bittman) Edith Davenport and Dr. Susanne Bügel both have different opinions and experiments regarding this controversy. Davenport’s being a personal experiment and Dr. Bügel’s being an experimental project. Experimental research was conducted by Susanne Bügel and colleagues from the Department of Human Nutrition, University of Copehagen tested three different methods to prove the ongoing battle between organic and conventional foods. The first crop grew the vegetables in soil which was low in nutrients using manure and no pesticides with the exception of one organically approved product. The second method applied low in nutrients using animal manure also but they combined the use of pesticides, as much as allowed by regulation. And the final method was a combination of high nutrients through mineral fertilizers and pesticides as legally allowed. The three crops were planted on adjacent fields and were treated and harvested in the same exact manner for each. After harvest, results showed that there were no significant differences using the three different methods. The experiment was taken even further by feeding the products of the three crops to the animals over a two year course which also resulted in no differences (Society of Chemical Industry). I called Edith Davenport, who has

More about Organically Grown Food Versus Conventionally Grown

Open Document