| 7 | State one argument made by the author. | Rich patients in need of organs take advantage of the worlds poor. Promises of cash rewards for donation are sometimes not kept and when they are kept they can be for less than agreed upon. Given these disparities, legal organ trade will always lead to the exploitation of impoverished donors. A better solution to the global shortage of organs can be used unless the decreased had requested otherwise.
In Madeleine Peiner Cosman (2005) her journal states “by default we grant health passes to illegal aliens, yet illegal aliens harbor fatal diseases that American medicine fought and vanquished long ago”. Generally health care isn’t available for immigrants so health risks are be at a higher rate. They have to pay hospital visits and checkups out of pocket which can be extremely difficult because they are
My theory also is that eventually people will start bidding on artificial organs and the richer people will have say over a family that doesn't have a lot of money. If doctors wanted to replace original organs with artificial ones, it would take a lot of perfecting and obligating a clean bill of health for the patient. Who, if anyone, should be a prime candidate for these types of artificial/synthetic replacements? Do you feel that anyone should have access to them? Even a life-long smoker or alcoholic who knowingly subjected themselves to harmful substances?
In this article, the league can’t even come close to keeping up with the drug problem. The league is brining in so much money and they are worried about the cost of testing players when they will loose money in the long run if this problem doesn’t get resolved. Instead of the players making big impressions of the game, the MLB should step in and not care about the cost of the testing for all players because they are already a multi billion dollar
I do not feel along with many others that posted on this article that it is right or ethical any more than selling your organs through the black market. I feel people should be able to choose whether they want to donate or get rid of their organs or not because it is their body no one else’s. I also feel that maybe selling organs is not such a bad idea or so morally wrong. The way I look at it is if we have to many people that are needing these transplants why not sell them??? Yes, people who are going to sell them are most likely the poorer population but if it helps save another’s life then why not?
This cost Pfizer $2.3 billion dollars. If Pfizer hadn’t off-labeled their drugs, a chance of making more of money would not have been presented (Torrey). Another way that the companies profit is by not taking the drug back into the lab to find out new uses for it since they have off-labeling to fall back on. Going back in the laboratory and doing further research costs a great deal of money that doesn’t need to be spent when you can say that the drug can be “used for a different treatment.” The practice of this is not right, playing guessing games with others lives so that you can reap the benefits of their recovery or their
US Government Shutdown Essay Sample October 3, 2013Samples The country is confronted with trillion-dollar shortfalls, however most political pioneers are unwilling to propose genuine answers for trepidation of estranging voters who need everything. Uncommon engages support an expiration hold on business as usual, making it hard to settle things that everybody concurs are broken. Where is a way out? Small has risen up out of the fight season to address the actuality that legislature is unsustainable in its momentum shape. Moderate applicants promise more modest government, however no applicant has answers for handicapping medicinal services fetches.
Noncompliance is dangerous for the patient and frustrating for the physician. Up to 11% of hospital admissions, 40% of nursing home admissions, and about 125,000 deaths a year are due to noncompliance with prescribed medication regimens, according to the American Pharmacists Association “Drugs don't work in patients who don't take them (APA, 1994)." It should not be different if the patient is indigent and can not pay the bill because as a healthcare professional you should always treat every patient with the same respect disregarding there economic standpoint, race, or color. The way the economy has been the last couple years has had a big impact on why more patients are noncompliant. Patients will not buy or take medications if they can not afford it.
( Okie, p2). With this fear by immigrants major health concerns arose because in 1996 following the welfare-reform legislation immigrants were restricted Medicaid, which shifted health care responsibility to state and local governments. The reform also put into law for immigrants to wait five years after gaining permanent residency (green card) eligibility for federal benefits. This now creates a definite problem for our city because of the alarming number of potential outbreaks that can occur. It’s also poses a very important question: Who is going to pay for health care expenses created by illegal immigrants?
In 2000, $6.4 billion was spent on medical malpractice insurance as stated earlier, of that money only 3.2% came out of the physician’s revenue (trustedchoice.com). Insurance could cost anywhere from$4,000 to $34,000 (trustedchoices.com) depending on where the practice is but there’s no set limit to how much it costs and the cost is rising everyday while while the claims they were paying were actually decreasing (Nilsson, Traumatized). Annually medical errors in hospital could cost between $17 billion and $29 billion. Most people don’t realize that 1 in 8 preventable medical errors result in a malpractice lawsuit (trustedchoices.com), and 44,000 to 98,000 people die each year from preventable medical