Of Mice And Men Movie Vs Book Report

496 Words2 Pages
The book Of Mice and Men written by John Steinback shows the struggle in the 1930’s. It tells how people are lonely and how they need a companion. The book and movie both show how reality was hard on lower class people. The book and movie are both portrayed marvelously. The casting crew from Of Mice and Men is chosen wisely they all portray each character perfectly. Reading the book and imagining each character then watching the movie both portray fine. The book Of Mice and Men would have never made imaginary that Stable buck’s back was that messed up. If to pick what characters from either the book or the movie you would have to choose the movie for the reason that it’s more realistic more believable and more defined. The…show more content…
The movie moves you by showing the struggle of how hard it was to live. The movie also shows how Lennie’s disability is very bad. The book explains more that makes you more interested in what is happening. The book also focuses on the characters problems. Many scenes were omitted from the movie. The scene when Lennie is hiding in the brushes it does not show how he has memories of his Aunt Clara and the giant rabbit. A different scene which was omitted from the movie was when Candy curses the body of Curley’s wife. An added scene was in the beginning of the movies when it shows when George and Lennie were running from people on horses that were from Weed. The changes were made from the movie since the director from the movie did not want to make the book and the movie to much similar to each other. The book Of Mice and Men written by John Steinback shows the struggle in the 1930’s. It tells how people are lonely and how they need a companion. The book and movie both show how reality was hard on lower class people. Of Mice and Men the book is better. The book tells you in details of the characters struggle. In addition the book makes you want to keep on reading. The book makes the reader use their
Open Document