English Expository III September 15, 2011 Responsibility? In the article The Battle Against Fast Food begins at Home by Daniel Wientraub, he argues that it’s not the fast food industry or the video game manufactures that are at fault for children obesity, it is the parents who are at fault. Two arguments Wientraub made were, that parents are responsible for teaching their children good eating habits as well as good exercising habits. I agree with both those arguments. However the first argument he made which was that parents are in the best position to fight obesity , I disagree because parents don’t always know what their children are eating.
America’s Obesity Crisis America’s obesity problem is growing everyday. America’s obesity rate is about thirty- three percent, which is about one- third of adults; Approximately seventeen percent of children from the ages of two to nineteen are obese (CDC). Instead of taking personal responsibility, Americans are blaming McDonalds for their weight and health issues. They have taken it as far as pinning the fast food chain with lawsuits. I do not think that McDonalds should be held accountable for America’s obesity crisis.
In the article "Should Candy and Soda be Banned from Schools" by Tom Vilsack U.S Secretary of Agriculture, it is expressing the effect the eating habit's in which are being promoted throughout schools and how children are affected by them. There are two major aspects stated in this article. The first aspect is the steps that will try to be made in removing all unhealthy drinks and snacks from school vending machines. The second is the effects this has on children which in this particular case is Obesity. Both very valid arguments and we will begin to see why during this passage.
Jessica Ely Professor Lawrence ENGL1020 20 September 2012 Blame the Eater As Americans we are always hearing “don’t blame yourself for being obese blame the government.” Balko begins his essay with telling us that Time magazine and ABC News will host a three-day talk on obesity. The author says that the “summit promises to be a pep rally for media, nutrition activists, and policy makers” (395). Responsibility and government control over health care is the issue that Radly Balko tackles in “What You Eat Is Your Business”. The author argues that Americans are not taking responsibility for their eating habits and making it the general publics health problem. Balko feels that the issue of being obese should be your own problem and not the entire United States, and the government should not get “between us and our waistline”.
(282) my parents however would always tell me “don’t let your eyes get bigger than your stomach “right then I knew that they were telling me not to eat too much, eat until I was full and not to eat just because it was there. Even Bordo admits that with fast food chains on every corner childhood obesity is on the rise and the cultural meaning of fat and thin has changed . (283) Although she puts most of the blame on the media , we as a people have to be held accountable for what we do and what we allow to affect our
For many people, solutions to weight gain will be found both in new dietary behaviors and in medicines that come from labs where researchers study how the body burns and stores fat. To the extent that obesity is the result of a child’s inability to say “no” to a supersized meal, we should teach restraint just as Critser advises. But his behavioral fix will not work for everyone, and parents should be instructed on what to do when teaching restraint, alone, fails to keep their children reasonably trim. A more serious problem with Critser’s argument 5 is his use (twice) of the word “gluttony” and the judgmental attitude it implies. Early in the essay Critser argues that American parents need “to promulgate .
Fast Foods: Who's to Blame? Many people who consume junk food are blaming fast food restaurants for their obesity and the decisions they make. Shouldn't this be the consumer's responsibility? Or should fast food restaurants have to deal with the decisions the consumers make? The article, "The battle against fast food begins in the home" by Daniel Weintraub, explains how people are blaming McDonalds and other fast food restaurants such as Burger King, Kentucky Fried Chicken, Starbucks, and Pizza Hut for their obesity.
According to the article, Legislative Solutions to Unhealthy Eating and Obesity i Australia, there are health advocates that have been active and pushed their government to do something about the obesity epidemic. The government has funded social marketing campaigns, recreation infrastructure, such as parks, and healthy eating programs but at the same time, the food industry continues to throw out their advertisements with no regulations by the government. Health experts, however believe that though this may be a very important step to recognizing the seriousness of obesity in Australia, it will not be effective in reducing obesity. They feel that legislation must put into law in addressing obesity and place campaigns of public health problems such as road accidents and smoking habits (MacKay 2011). Many people believe that it is not the responsibility of the food industry that obesity is becoming a serious issue because it is based on sole responsibility of what they choose to eat, whether they choose to exercise or not, and in the case of child obesity, the lack of responsibility the parents maintain; and the food industry concurs when addressed by the government.
Current Business Research: Project Childhood Obesity Childhood obesity is a terrifying prospect for the future of America. As a nation we have failed to acknowledge childhood obesity even as the medical community continues to warn us of the dangers. Recently the Health Department has expressed the need for change and has classified childhood obesity as an epidemic in light of escalating health problems, increased death rates, and rising medical care costs. The problem lies in the responsibility for this epidemic, whether it is government or family responsibility. Government has always tried to stay out of family issues; however, this costs tax dollars, and the government is considering imposing regulations to ensure children are meeting
Whatever they argue or use to explain obesity, functionalists would say that it is valid and important to society and is better for society as a whole. Conflict theory is based entirely in power and how those in power do all they can to hold the majority of the population down and to keep them from gaining power, so as to secure their own position. Conflict theorists would say that obesity is a product of the living conditions, stress and poor quality of food and health education that those in power choose and enforce for those that aren't in power. Conflict theorists might say that those that are in power (those that make laws, those that own companies, etc) willingly set up society so that the cheaper the good is, the more unhealthy it is, and so the poor might only be able to afford cheap, unhealthy bulk food and become susceptible to obesity. Conflict theorists might say that food education might be controlled by larger government forces (like the Food and Drug Administration, United States Department of Agriculture, American Diatetics Association, etc), who look out for their own bottom line and corporate interests from sponsors and lobbyists.