Nursing Theory Critique

1121 Words5 Pages
Abstract In this paper I will perform an evaluation of Martha Rogers’s theory of the Science of Unitary Human Beings using Chinn & Kramer (2004) model for evaluating a theory. The evaluation will reflect description of the theory as well as critical reflection of the theory that Chinn & Kramer (2004) has utilized in developing the criteria for evaluating theories. Theory Critique Chinn and Kramer (as citied by Meleis, 2012) developed a model that has given a reviewer a set of questions to help in the evaluation of theories and the knowledge that it incorporates. The questions lead the reviewer through the description and critical reflection of the theory. In the following paragraphs I will address each question purposed as it relates to Martha Rogers’s theory of the Science of Unitary Human Beings. The questions deal with the purpose, concepts, relationships, structure and assumptions of the theory. I will then utilize the critical reflection concept of the model to further evaluate the theory. Purpose of the Science of Unitary Human Beings The purpose of the Science of Unitary Human Beings (Blumenshein, 2009) was to allow nurses a chance to look at the world with alternative eyes. The theory suggests that human beings and the environment cannot be understood unless they are studied as a whole.(Wright, 2007) We are unitary human beings. As unitary human beings we are complex and inseparable energy fields with the environment. To look at and understand one you must study the other. Concepts of the Science of Unitary Human Beings The concepts of the Science of Unitary Human Beings (Blumenshein, 2009) are as follows: * Energy fields are the basic units of both the living and the nonliving. The energy field is a constant presence that will change in density, intensity and extent with the passing of time. * Openness is a way to describe
Open Document