Confidentiality means not sharing information about people without their knowledge and agreement, and ensuring that written and electronic information cannot be accessed or read by people who have no reason to see it. Confidentiality is important because clients may not trust a support worker who does not keep information confidential. Clients may not feel valued or able to keep their self-esteem if their private details are shared with others. Client’s safety may be put at risk if details of their property and habits are shared publicly. It is important that information is only shared with people “who need to know”.
The first amendment says: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech…” (Bill of Rights). Freedom of speech is a good example of the limitations we have as US citizens because we are not permitted to use that amendment if it affects public safety. For example, we are not allowed to say that we have a bomb in an airplane when it is not true. As long as it does not provoke any other consequences in other people we can use the first amendment. The second amendment works the same way; we have the right to have a gun as long as it does not interfere with public safety,
- cert was granted ISSUE: - Did the FBI violated Katz 4th Amendment Right? (to privacy) HOLDING: - Yes REASONING: - The phone booth should be considered protected when doors are shut but the 4th amend. protects persons not places from unreasonable intrusion. In a public place, a person can have that reasonable expectation (but isn't protected because of plain view) Since the government was electronically listening and recording the conversation, it is constituted as a search & seizure. Under the 4th amend., the absence of a warrant during a search & seizure (they had probable cause as well) evidence should of been inadmissible.
tamper proof-the hard copy cannot be altered electronically, which is useful for legal documents a confrimation receipt can be requested showing that the fax was delivered successfully fax machine-disadvantages fax machines are usually shared in an office, the delivery receipt confirms it had arrived successfully, but it could have been picked up by the wrong person. the quailty of the faxed documents can sometimes make them difficult to read. if the recipients fax machine isnt turned on or working then you cannot send the fax to them. video confrencing-advantages no need for people to travel for face to face meetings effectively face to face meetings can take place with people who are located all over the world video confrencing-disadvantages special hardware is required for video conferencing and everyone who wants to take part has to have compatible
Adults with a learning disability or a mental health problem have a right to see their file if they understand the nature of the request. Social work departments can refuse access to all or part of a persons file for certain reasons, for example, where access to the information would be likely to cause serious harm to the physical or mental health of the person or another person. Withholding of information is expected to be used in exceptional circumstances only. Human rights act 1998 This covers a variety of rights which include; • Everyone's right to life shall be protected by law. • No-one shall be subject to degrading treatment.
CQC cannot prosecute for a breach of this regulation or any of its parts, but we can take regulatory action. See the offences section on pages 10-11 of this guidance for more detail. CQC must refuse registration if providers cannot satisfy us that they can and will continue to comply with this regulation. Regulation 5: Fit and proper persons: directors Summary of the Regulation The intention of this regulation is to ensure that people who have director level responsibility
How can search and seizure pose a concern for private security? For one reason, security officials do not have the same authority as law enforcement. I don’t believe that security officers have the power to search individuals or property at any time. Security firms have to be extremely cautious about getting a law suit for violating a person’s right. Therefore, this poses a major concern for security firms.
It protects the guilty rather than the victims. This rule basically states that evidence obtained illegally cannot be used in a criminal trial. The basis of this rule is supposed to prevent the police and other sections of the government from illegally searching or violating our homes and our privacy. When all it really does is prevents the truth from surfacing and help criminals go free. After researching both sides of this issue, in no way am I stating that I don’t understand the determination of the opposing side to keep this rule.
(American Library Association 1). Challenges are often denied because of the loyalty of concerned citizens to our freedom of speech and the First Amendment. According to the First Amendment of the Constitution, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and the petition the government for a redress of grievances.” ("The Constitution of the United States," Amendment 1). This is simply saying that we are guaranteed the right of free expression, and the infringement of this right (censoring materials) is illegal. Even though it is against the law, I can see why this book was banned, and I somewhat agree with the bowdlerization of it.
According to O’Connor (2009) “The USA Patriot Act, for example, violates the First Amendment’s free speech guarantees by barring those who have been subject to search orders from telling anyone about those orders, even in situations where no need for secrecy can be proven. It also authorizes the FBI to investigate citizens who choose to exercise their freedom of speech with no need to prove that any parts of their speech might be labeled illegal”. I think if someone says something that would cause the FBI to investigate it than there must be something behind it. I don’t think the FBI would intentionally waste their own time investigating an