Nonprofit Case Study

1227 Words5 Pages
Revenue Resource Plan - Section #3 PEER COMPARISON Your Nonprofit Name/EIN: The ALS association St. Louis Chapter/ 43-1458163 Peer Nonprofit Name/EIN: Project A.L.S/ 13-4019464 Peer Nonprofit Name/EIN: The ALS Association Connecticut Chapter/ 04-3417472 Compare Financial Performance Metrics (2013) Comparative Categories The ALS Association St. Louis Chapter Project A.L.S The ALS Association Connecticut Chapter Charity Navigator Score 89.72 75.72 86.27 Program Expenses % 80.1% 81.7% 75.5% Administrative Expenses % 6.6% 7.3% 7.4% Fundraising Expense % 13.1% 10.8% 16.9% Surplus/(Deficit) % of Revenue 28.51% -24.49% 6.28% Other Information Primary Revenue Growth 14.7% -29.4% -1.1% Program Expense Growth -1.1% -22.6% 7.0% Work in capital .99 .16 1.05 Fundraising Efficiency $0.09 $0.14 $0.17 SUMMARY ANALYSIS The main contrasts between my selected non-profit organization “The ALS…show more content…
Louis Chapter” and the other two peer non-profit organizations ‘Project A.L.S.” and “The ALS Association Connecticut Chapter” is their serving field. According to the mission of these companies, each organization is working for the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Their missions are “The ALS Association, St. Louis Regional Chapter is committed to improve the attribute of life for those precious by ALS, educating the community, and supporting research”, “Project A.L.S. set out to put medicine into place. The mission today is to bring the best science to ALS patients in the form of effective treatments and, ultimately, a cure” and “The ALS Association Connecticut Chapter helps people living with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and leaves no stone unturned in search for the cure” [(Charity Navigator - Advanced Search. (n.d.). Retrieved April 6, 2015, from

More about Nonprofit Case Study

Open Document