Although police officers stand for peace, there are many countries where people view police not as the hero but as the villain. Even in safe, developed countries like Canada and the United States, acts of police misconduct have occurred. For these reasons, police officers should not be allowed to carry firearms. Eliminating guns won’t eliminate police misconduct; however it will take some power away from them but that can be good because they will also be gaining power this way. It sounds confusing but when people see a man with a gun, no matter what side of the law he is on, they will get intimidated and possibly fear him.
A rule that does so little to protect the law as it was made. The exclusionary rule allows criminals to go because evidence was illegally obtained, but what about the victims of the crimes. It is almost a turntable and they have become a victim for a second time. I am going to discuss the three main reasons why we as citizens should get rid of the rule. One is the releasing the guilty back into society, next is the slowing down of the criminal process and the last thing is the behavior and consequence of the police officers involved in the cases.
Like the item says, 'functionalist sociologists focus on how far individuals accept the norms and values of society.' Durkheim blames people not being fully integrated into society’s norms and values as to why they commit crime. So he said once people have served their time for their crime, they should be reintegrated. It’s a strength that Durkheim suggests them being reintegrated as it means they’re less likely to reoffend if they feel they belong to their society and do not look for status through crime. However, interactionists would say that agents of social control cause crime, not the society you are in.
Does corruption within the Police Service interfere with the performance of its members? Lawrence. W. Sherman reports, “For as long as there have been police, there has been corruption”. Police corruption can defined as any prescribed act involving the misuse of the officer’s official position for money or money’s worth or personal gain (Barker& Roebuck, 1983). Three elements identify police corruption 1) The behaviour must be forbidden by law, rule, regulation and ethical standard.
As a result, they engage in reaction formation and reject the middle class world. Since they can’t get status and respect, they all get together and form a gang, and in that way give status and respect to each other. On the other side, Cloward and Ohlen accept Cohen’s views on the structural origins of crime and deviance; however, they criticize Cohen’s cultural explanation of crime. They say that just because the boys’ opportunities are limited it doesn’t mean a boy should become a criminal. According to their theory there are three types of gangs which are: Conflict, Criminal & retreatist.
Criminal Acts and Choice Theories Response The basis of the “choice theory” is to show why and/or what causes a criminal to make the choice to commit a crime. Every person has to make their own choices and decisions and criminals make irrational decisions when, where, and how to commit a crime. All the while giving no thought to the punishments for their actions because the personal gain is of greater value to them. Criminals do not believe the laws apply to them. The criminal commit crimes for personal gain, money, power, and status.
The purpose also is if law enforcement was to take the evidence it would not be used in the court of law unless issue or that person can be set free of all charges. Basically one wrong moved can make us lose a suspect of a horrible crime if we are not careful. Law enforcement just need to be cautious so they are doing their jobs correct, and setting a person free will get them into trouble (cjlf.org, 2011). When we are identifying the exclusionary rule it is a great rule to have so police have to stop and think. Police have to think before they search because it could cost them a lot if they just do what they want.
In this case the judge would be handling this situation out of spit, because he would be ready to leave and not continue his work, which is very unprofessional. Taking kickbacks from private juvenile detention facilities for locking more juveniles up on questionable charges I believe this is unethical, because this is just a simple form of bribery and is very much known in the Criminal Justice field. Taking a kickback for more juveniles would be unethical because it would be ruining young adults lives by locking them up for their own personal gain. Banning one of the defense attorneys in a case from speaking during the trial I believe that this is unethical, because this will cripple the individual who is trying to win a case especially if they are not guilty of the crime that they are being accused of. Suggesting to persons appearing before him to contribute to certain charities in lieu of paying
It is labor for their community and to use the criminal for the purpose to help stop recidivism. This program can affect the society two way, one it can make some people afraid to walk when these criminals are out and about doing project that the city believe need. Second, some may want to watch the criminal all of the time to ensure that they do not fool around and not finish the work at
To discourage and deter people from committing crimes means that something must be done to prevent this action. This is done via corrections; when people see what happens to people who commit crimes, people will have a tendency to shy away from it (Gardner, T. & Anderson, T., 2012). Protecting the society from dangerous and harmful people is the job of law enforcement. They hit the streets, the waterways, and the air to ensure the citizens are protected from criminals (Gardner, T. & Anderson, T., 2012). Punishing people who commit crime is the job of the prosecution lawyer; they attempt to put the violators behind bars (Gardner, T. & Anderson, T., 2012).