Nietzsche vs the Hunger Game Essay

791 Words4 Pages
In Friedrich Nietzsche's "On the Genealogy of Morality", it is not about morality but the value's value and concept. It concerns about what do we call good, or call bad by observing and making judgment. The term 'good' means noble, aristocratic and 'bad' means low, plebeian(13). Nietzsche's first essay is defining the terms 'good and bad' is called master morality and 'good and evil' is called slaves morality. Master morality is practice by the rich, healthy, powerful and strong that define themselves as "good" and "bad" for those who is poor, powerless and have difficulty in living. On the other hand, the poor, lower class, slave and powerless define themselves as "good" but "evil" to their master or high class people, this is called slave morality. When the resentment occurs among the slave towards the master, the belief to fight for survival from the slave is strong and makes them powerful while in contrast, the master become less powerful because the luxury life they have, make them more vulnerable (21-22). In Nietzsche's the second essay, he suggests that guilt and conscience is like the relationship between buyer and seller, creditor and debtor. This relationship exists also between people and the community they live in. The community is the one providing shelter, peace and security. The act of breaking the laws of the community is consider as assaulting(46-47). According to Nietzsche, guilt is not accountable and immoral but as debt and punishment is not meted out on the basis of guilt but a certain form of payback (39-40). Thus, if a person failed to keep the promises or pay off the debt, he may be punished, tortured or killed in order to balance out the debt (53). The resentment that mentioned in the first essay, may occur with the people who received the punishment. This may create different type of power- power of consciousness from the community to

More about Nietzsche vs the Hunger Game Essay

Open Document