Nexus of Contracts Theory

981 Words4 Pages
Question 1 Veljanovski provides economic intuition behind the law of contracts. He argues that contracts form a crucial building block of efficient markets as they enable stakeholders to eliminate inefficiencies and other complexities in transactions. The nexus-of-contracts theory defines the concept of ‘the corporation’ in line with Veljanovski’s claim that firms are “… a complex network of property rights and contracts” (p.113). The theory postulates that firms are merely a set of implicit and explicit contracts between a group of stakeholders, predominantly shareholders, creditors, managers, employees, suppliers and customers. The complex system of contracts within a corporation is the ‘nexus’ which links the stakeholders. Hayden and Bodie present a recent discussion of the nexus-of-contracts theory which originated from Jensen and Meckling’s theory of human behavior and other contractarian scholars. The social theory asserts that ‘social contracts’ are the result of a bargaining process between self-interested, rational stakeholders; similar to the ‘bargain theory’ mentioned by Veljanovski. The nexus-of-contracts theory applies this social perspective in defining corporations as “legal fictions” serving to minimize transaction costs of the negotiation process between stakeholders (Hayden and Bodie). Hence contractarians argue that firms should not be treated as entities; a corporation does not exist in itself as it is a non-tangible concept. Instead firms consist of a framework of measurable contractual relations (Hayden and Bodie). The nexus-of-contracts theory has provided crucial foundations in the development of legal theory conveying both descriptive and prescriptive elements (Hayden and Bodie). There is ongoing academic debate on how the theory should be interpreted in creating an effective legal framework. An example of the theory of constraints
Open Document