Chow breaks the following 3 rules: never use a long word when a short one will do, never use a simile, metaphor, or other figure of speech which you are seeing in print, and never use a foreign phrase, a scientific or jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent. The rule never use a long world when a short one will do is saying that long words don’t make you sound smarter unless they are used in the correct context, sometimes they have the opposite effect. They are also less likely to be understood and more awkward to read. Chow breaks this rule when she says “It would look innocuous enough...” (40), when she could have made it easier for the reader to understand by just replacing the word innocuous with the word bland. This rule is also broken when she uses the word gangrenous to describe flesh, instead of using a word that could create more imagery for the reader such as rotten or decomposed flesh, which is also easier to understand.
Verbal acts - verbal acts not offered for their truth. Non hearsay. An offer made or to defame someone. Such a statement is not excluded by the hearsay rule, because it has a legal significance completely apart from its truth or falsity. The testimony of Pam Duffy, wife of Gadget Co. CEO Charlie Duffy.
Answer: false Reason: When an argument is standardized, the conclusion is placed under the premises. 5. When diagramming an argument, you should not number or diagram anything that is not a statement. Answer: true Reason: because arguments, by definition, consist entirely of statements. So any sentences are not statement should not be numbered or
Nonstandard diction refers to expressions that are not considered legitimate words according to the rules of Standard English usage. Nonstandard diction includes "ain't," "theirselves," "hisself," "anyways," "alot" (the accepted version is "a lot"), and "alright" (the accepted version is "all right"). Most good dictionaries will identify such expressions with the word "Nonstandard." ( When you refer to information contained in Joe’s book (and everyone is required to do this) but have no reference, your essay is not theoretically sophisticated. You must have references even if you do not directly quote.
LB+:There should have been bacterial growth but no blue colonies because there was an anti-biotic acting against it. LB-: Nothing should have happened because there was no bacteria and plasmid given. 3. One of the plates should have no growth and that was the LB- plate. This happened because the plate was given no bacteria or anything to start growth.
None of the options listed below is case sensitive, and each may be used with a hyphen (-) or a forward slash (/). Separate multiple command-line switches with a space, but do not put a space inside a command-line switch (for example, /r /f1Install.iss is valid, but /r/f1 Install.iss is not). When you use long path and file name expressions with switches, enclose the expressions in double quotation marks. The double quotation marks indicate to the operating system that spaces within the quotation marks are not to be treated as command-line delimiters. Command line switches not listed will be ignored by the
D) Phases are often shown for each compound but are not critical to balancing an equation. E) All of the above statements (a-d) are true. 8. Which of the following statments is not true of balancing a chemical equation? A) Subscripts in the reactants must be conserved in the products.
8 [August 1991], p. 519.) Chi Square: Let H0 = The correctness of prediction is independent of the cola type and H1 = The correctness of prediction depends upon the cola type There is no statistical evidence to suggest that the correctness of prediction is dependent on the cola type. Two-tail z- Test: H0: There is no difference between the abilities to identify the colas; that is, the correctness of prediction is independent of the cola type; that is, p1 – p2 = 0 Ha: There is a difference between the abilities to identify the colas; that is, the correctness of prediction depends upon the cola type; that is, p1 – p2 ≠
| | |- be considered metaphors because the word or words used are not taken literally | Note: When the distinction is made, it is the following: when A is used to refer to B, it is a synecdoche if A is a component of B and a metonymy if A is commonly associated with B but not actually part of its whole. PART 3: SUMMARY 1. Which one is the most appropriate definition of metonymy a. Metonymy is the use of comparision of one thing with another. Metonymy is the use of word or phrase to indicate something different from the literal meaning. Metonymy is the use of the name of one thing to substitute for that of another to which it is related.
Idato states in the article: ‘when they realise there are no lawmakers and there are no laws, there are no policemen. When there is nothing, no sense of government when anarchy takes hold, it’s ultimately the end.’ This furthermore relates the article to the book, comparing adults to policemen of the school boys; which were non-existent at the time, therefore not being a complete system of laws, and lawmakers. Although they do create a few rules (such as only being able to speak when the conch is held by oneself), they aren’t exactly laws; being easily broken without personal consequences, especially on the island. For example, when the conch is destroyed along with Piggy from Roger’s rolled rock, much of the authority is no longer distributed (only really belonging to Jack), but we don’t see him serving a jail sentence for three years or so. They just move