Someone could be born with genes to give them a normal height, but be malnourished in childhood, resulting in stunted growth and a failure to develop as expected. Both of these topics develop a person as a whole, Nature and Nurture determine the development of a person, but heredity, location, and environment affects the upbringing. During the upbringing of a child, heredity plays a vital role in determining a person’s predispositions as well as developmental potential. Scientists for years have known that traits such as eye color, hair color, and even how tall a person will be is determined by specific genes encoded in each human’s cell. The nature theory goes further in describing in more detail that intelligence, aggression, and even personality are also in an individual’s DNA.
| Moriah Moriah was born with Down Syndrome (Trisomy-21). Is this nature, nurture, or an interaction? |Nature | Justify your answer: |It is possible that string of down syndrome is within the family health history. | Patrick and Erick Patrick and Erick are identical twins. They were separated at birth, but then were reunited while in elementary
Philosopher John Locke believed in the empiricist theory that humans are born with a blank slate and the environment influences development. Empiricists believe that our experiences and how we are raised is makes us who we are. Identical twins, or monozygotic twins, form when a single fertilized egg splits in two. 2 They both share 100% of genetic information. Fraternal twins, or dizygotic twins, from two eggs fertilized by two sperm, and they share 50% genetic of information.
Persuasive Essay: Nurture vs. Nature There has always been a large controversy on whether it is nature or nurture that affect human behavior and personality. Some people may believe that the secret to one’s identity is in genes, but the real answer can be found in the surroundings. Psychologists have been studying this topic for years and years, and have constructed revolutionary theories. It is evident that nurture has a larger impact on personality and behavioral development, based on studies on three different subjects; early childhood development; feral children and isolates; and knowledge and intelligence.
For many years the issue of nature versus nurture has been one of the biggest debates in the study of psychology. The argument for nature assumes not only our height, looks, eye color, etc. are inborn, but also that the same goes for our character, intelligence, sexual orientation, etc. (Myers, 2013, p. 6). The argument for nurture assumes that the mind begins as a blank slate, known as tabula rasa, and that everything in the mind comes from the external world through the senses (Myers, 2013, p. 6; McLleod, 2007).
This argument led to ongoing debate of sociobiology and evolutionary psychology. Some have pointed out that the premise of the "nature versus nurture" debate seems to contradict the significance of free will. If all our traits are determined by our genes, by our environment, by chance, or by some combination of these acting together, then there seems to be little room for free will To sort out the effects of genes
We often think what makes us who we are today or why we act the way we do. Is it the environment that leads us to think and act in certain ways or is it already in our genes. These thoughts cause us to think about the nature and nurture debate. The 2 life stages I am going to talk about are 4-9 (childhood) and 10-18 (adolescence). Nature is all of the genes and hereditary factors that influence who we are such as our physical appearances (eye colour, hair colour, height, weight and skin colour) and our personalities (physical, intellectual, emotional and social skills) you could also get genetic diseases such as down’s syndrome , fragile X syndrome.
Their basic assumption is that the characteristics of the human species as a whole are a product of evolution and that individual differences are due to each person’s unique genetic code. Environmentalists hold the assumption that at birth, the human mind is a “blank slate,” and that this is gradually filled as a result of experience. From this point of view, psychological characteristics and behavioral differences that emerge through infancy and childhood are the result of learning. It is how you are brought up that governs the psychologically significant aspects of child development” (McLeod, 2007). HOW HAS CURRENT THEORY BEEN INFLUENCED BY THE NATURE VS. NURTURE CONTROVERSY?
Structural equation modeling with a jackknife approach was used to analyze data separately for each twin in the pair. At 12 months, maternal personality and infant temperament contributed indirectly to MacArthur-Bates Total Vocabulary and Bayley Mental Development Index scores through parental stress. In addition,infant temperament directly contributed to 12-month MacArthur-Bates Total Vocabulary. At 18 months, these relationships were no longer significant. The different findings at 12 months compared to 18 months may reflect important developmental and environmental shifts, as well as possible differences in the method and measurements used at each age.
Gottesman and Shields carried out early familial studies and gave % likelihood rates for various relatives. For example, if you have a parent with schizophrenia, the life-time risk of schizophrenia for you is 5.6%. Family studies have confirmed that the disorder does tend to run in families; however it is not clear whether this is due to genetics or environmental factors. Twin and adoption studies have been carried out to investigate this. As monozygotic twins have 100% of genes in common, it is suggested that the concordance rate for them is greater then dizygotic twins.