Identify laws related to the benefits and pay program Laws related to benefits and pay programs vary from business to business. In your case Bradley, moving to a new area allows you to benchmark the competition. A small Limo company of 50 employees will be affected by the Affordable Care Act (Obama Care) which allows small business owners to shop for private health insurance. As your consultant we recommend that you offer benefits to your employees. It will only keep your employees happy and you can use your benefits package as a bargaining tool in the hiring process as other Limo companies do not offer
Senator McCain explains his record of bipartisanship and says that the situation today cries out for bipartisanship. He attacks Senator Obama’s bipartisan record alleging that he never voted against party lines. Senator McCain wants to give every American a $5,000 refundable tax credit whereas Senator Obama wants a 50 percent tax credit so that small companies can buy health insurance for their workers. He also assures to lower the cost of insurance premiums by up to $2,500 a year. He believes in investing in prevention and use information technology
In Path to Prosperity, Paul Ryan offers an 80% cut in discretionary spending - the largestgutting of governmental public services in our lifetime - and FEMA finds itself stuck on the chopping block. Although exact numbers aren't given to how much disaster funds would be cut, it's safe to say that calling 211 might be the only option left in a nation starved for cash flow. This was the point made by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid yesterday when he chastised Mitt and Paul for even thinking that they could show sympathy for the hurricane victims. A bit harsh? Yes.
Dear Mr. Singer, World poverty is one of the biggest issues in the world. Your essay from The Singer Solution to World Poverty makes people more aware of poverty and raised a hot discussion about the way out. I partly agree with your argument that every individual has responsibility to the world community and every one should make effort to make differences in saving children from world poverty. However, I found that your solution is somehow unrealistic and a bit too extreme by demanding people to donate every cent of their extra money. Everyday, wealthy consumers buy big-screen TV's, $100,000 Mercedes, and countless other luxury items.
|Name: Lauren Reed |Date: 3/31/15 | Graded Assignment Practice: The Loan Ranger Answer the following questions based on what you have learned. You may need to search for an online loan calculator to answer the questions. (10 points) |Score | | | 1. The owners of a successful restaurant want a loan for $50,000 to renovate the kitchen and expand the dining room. They expect that the extra tables will add between $2,000 and $5,000 to the restaurant’s monthly revenue.
Braulio Sanchez 5118986 Singer’s Unrealistic Solution In the New York Times article, “The Singer Solution to World Poverty,” Peter Singer tries to persuade his audience to donate a huge chunk of their annual earnings to charities that assist those children that are impoverished overseas. Singer does this by proposing almost insane, unrealistic ideas, such as donating more than half of their income and only living off of necessities. This, of course, is preposterous because as humans we want to have luxury items such as expensive TVs and fancy cars so we can enjoy our leisure time. When looking at this article its ineffectiveness becomes clear; this article in its entirety is a giant appeal to the readers’ emotions with not enough logical or reasonable arguments to support his argument. Although Singer has strong ethos because of his status as a philosopher, his essay is ineffective due to his misuse of two certain scenarios in order to persuade people to donate by making them feel guilty & relies far too much on pathos to persuade his audience rather than focusing on logos and ethos.
Also cutting down on what we spend on our so called, “luxury” items. Peter says, “An American household with an income of $50,000 spends around $30,000 annually on necessities, according go the conference board, a non-profit organization. We should donate around $20,000 at least to help the world. So whatever you don’t spend on “luxury” items, should be given away to the needy, or donated.” (568). that will never happen though.
Also, when America itself has problems, we should be more focused on correcting our own country rather than helping others. Not many people realize the fact that the U.S. really isn’t doing as well as we should be. Putting money into operations such as “Operation Iraqi Freedom” because of the fact that we lost an incredible amount of money on something pretty pointless. Iraq is still terrible and will continue to be terrible. Spending money on improving other countries isn’t always going to have a positive impact.
The central flaw is that Singer uses a bad analogy of how the global economy actually is, it assumes that the child has somehow appeared there of his own devices and that a simple act will save him. Many of Singer’s key principals, such as the importance of impartiality and the irrelevance of distance are very strong and I find it hard to disagree with them. Whilst I do not agree that to adopt Singer’s solution will cause actual harm to me it is not convincing as the most effective way to solve the problems of poverty. To follow Singer’s principal will amount to everyone else jumping in the water and drowning to some small degree. I believe that while Singer develops his argument by claiming that while people in rich states can survive without luxuries; those in poorer ones where most are manufactured could not survive, as their economic base would fall apart.
President Obama has given 54,000,000 Americans coverage for preventive services free of cost; 32,500,000 Americans who will not have to pay co pays for many preventive services; 3,600,000 seniors who saved $2.1 billion on prescribed drugs; 3,100,000 more young adults that have health insurance under their parents plan and 50,000 uninsured people with pre-existing conditions have gained coverage. President Obama’s health wants to get rid of Obama’s health care which would up costs. He also just wants to give insurance or healthcare to people who already had existing coverage. This shows that Gov. Mitt Romney does not care for the welfare of all Americans like President Obama.