Discuss how reflection can develop professional practice through critically analysing two different models/theories of reflection in this module. The definition of reflection has been defined differently by various authors. Cottrell (2010) suggests that reflection is a type of thinking that is linked to gaining a better understanding of something and that it is also an important part of the learning experience and where we can make sense of the experience. This can be related to Boyd and Fales (1983) who suggest that reflection is a process which can be used to examine and explore an area of concern and which could potentially end in a changed perspective. These views can be compared to Boud et al.
The third part is if partially admitting guilt, will this make them feel better or worse than not admitting guilt at all. The references used span from all the way back to 1957 with Sykes and Matza’s Techniques of Neutralizations; A theory of delinquency, to 2013 with Hilbig and Hessler’s What lies beneath: How the distance between truth and lie drives dishonesty. The article writers aren’t biased in their scientific approach. They find a problem, do their research, come up with a hypothesis, and conduct studies with proper usage of the scientific
REVIEW OF ARTICLE “THE LADDER OF INFERENCE” Review of Article “The Ladder of Inference” Kermit D. Jones Averett University Y4101 IDS 301 Principles of Adult Learning Assignment 1, July 28, 2012 REVIEW OF ARTICLE “THE LADDER OF INFERENCE” The Ladder of Inference is a system designed to show how assumptions can cause miscommunications. This system is also designed to build the skills of reflection and inquiry. It also shows us that we need to slow our pace and spend more time reasoning things through and thinking about the true facts. Unwillingness to slow our pace and think things through could lead us to make wrong conclusions, which could cause conflict with other people who may have drawn quite different conclusions. The Ladder of Inference demonstrates why two people can observe the same event and describe it differently; they are paying attention to different details.
In another article, written by Dr. David Keirsey he refers to people with the INTJ personality type “Masterminds”. (2012) I felt like the reason he refers to the INTJ person this way is because of the way they have to plan, and are prepared for any change that might take place. There was just so much to these two articles that reflected who I am as a person. As I mentioned before I questioned the accuracy of the Myers-Briggs personality
“What message do you think the author was trying to convey in this piece?” It is a question repeated time and time again in literature study classrooms around the world and speaks to our innate curiosity to know and understand anything and everything better. The issue of authorial intention can be hotly debated amongst any philosophers depending on their stance and knowledge of the subject, as well as any student of the arts, from painting to literature. One of the current debates on the subject was sparked by Gary Iseminger’s, “An Intentional Demonstration?” which introduced and discussed his argument for actual intentionalism, credit for which he gives to E.D. Hirsch, later referring to actual intentionalism as Hirschian intentionalism. The argument asserts that at least some interpretive statements about a poem, later applicable to other literary works as well, are and must be “underwritten” by intentional authorial meanings.
Can a person really block memories of traumatic events and then recover the memories, or is this phenomena a case for false memory syndrome? This paper is going to process two differing views on the subject of block and recovered memories, one for and one against the use. The paper will cover the facts as well as opinions presented by both sides and the strengths, weaknesses, and how credible both sides were in the argument. Finally, the paper will select which side the author agrees with more as well as which side contemporary research supports. Facts and Opinions On the con side of the argument is John Kihlstrom who believes that the claims of blocked and recovered memories are nothing more than clinical folklore with no scientific study or evidence to provide proof.
No work is going to deal with a theme in exactly the same way as any other work, so there's plenty to discuss here. (And notice that we still haven't mentioned your profession.) E (Reflection): Here's where you connect your theme, the works, and your profession. How can you apply the ideas in the works to what you do? How can others learn from it?
Although this paper is in many ways critical of traditional REBT, its primary aim is not to argue against REBT but, more constructively, to further inter-disciplinary debate. The development of REBT This is how the Albert Ellis Institute defines REBT: REBT is a practical, action-oriented approach to coping with problems and enhancing personal growth. REBT places a good deal of its focus on the present: on currently-held attitudes, painful emotions and maladaptive behaviours that can sabotage a fuller experience of life. REBT also provides people with an individualised set of proven
2.Questionnaire The primary method used for participant feedback was a written questionnairesent to participants. The questionnaire asked about expectations, usefulness of individual sessions, effectiveness of presenters, and amount of learning in specific topic areas. To assess their learning, participants were asked to rate how much they learned on a variety of topics. The answers gave a more in-depth view of the impact of the institute on learners. These comments illustrated the value and outcomes of the institute and illuminated the results from the rating scales.
Then after I was completed with my critical review I would also invite peer review to see if there was a perspective that I missed. Define free will, truth, knowledge, and opinion. Explain how we use them to form thoughts. Free will is the ability to make a choice or decision on your own. Truth defined is “what is so about something, the reality of the matter, as distinguished from what people wish were so, believe to be so, or assert to be so” (Ruggiero, 2009).