Much Ado About Nothing. Realism or Romance

704 Words3 Pages
In ‘Much Ado about Nothing’, Shakespeare presents us with two very different versions of love and marriage. Discuss whether or not we see ‘more realism than romance’ (p5 Introduction – Jonathan Bate) portrayed in Act 1. When asked whether I think Much Ado about Nothing is more romantic than realistic I feel immediately inclined to say yes. Straight away the main topic of the play is introduced; marriage and love. Shakespeare makes sure the characters in the first act are clashing – opinions wise, and easy to read – or seem it. This makes the question of whether the love in the play is more realistic or romantic, a complex one, that probably doesn’t have a straight forward answer becuause the different characters all contribute to the different ideas. I am going to look at the characters Beatrice, Benedik and Claudio and what their attitude towards love is. Arguably Jonathan Bate is correct in saying that the play is more realistic than romantic. Both Beatrice and Benedik, in Act One, share their ideas on love and marriage. Beatrice is very adamant that love is not something she would like to invest her time in. She allows this to become a prominent part of her own personality by the use of animalistic imagery. She uses the words ‘crow’ and ‘bark’, both relating, in some sense, to animals. This immediately gives the impression that Beatrice cannot help how she feels because, just like wild animals, she has an instinct, which cannot be changed easily. Therefore it is not her fault that she finds it hard to love. However, the animals she refers to are both animals that travel in packs/flocks, this link shows the reader that in actual fact, Beatrice has an underlying want of feeling protected and being able to protect (both in which happen due to love). This says to me that although Beatrice makes out she doesn’t believe in the sugar-coated, hyperbole of love, she
Open Document