Of Mice and Men Argumentative Essay In “Of Mice and Men”, by John Steinbeck, George, the stories protagonist, is forced to make a very hard choice with none of the three outcomes having a happy ending. George was faced with three options, one of which was to shoot his best friend Lennie. George ends up having to shoot his long time friend. And although it is generally accepted that it was the right decision, how is George able to justify his actions? And were they justifiable at all?
By creating the horrifying setting, the readers can have a feeling that they are also inside the story and watching all these events happening. Also, people have a kind of motion that when they are being horrified, in the meanwhile, they will feel excited at the same time. Therefore, the fog and darkness surrounding the city is an embellishment of the Gothic genre, which impressed me so much. In the century of the book, the people had no picture of what is split personality. In the book, nobody would have think of the idea of two souls living in a person, therefore, it makes the book become more suspicious.
When faced with a hard decision with no time to think, we often make irrational decisions based on certain circumstances. To take the law upon oneself is not an option available to those who have no authority. John Steinbeck’s ‘Of Mice and Men’ readers are confronted with a situation of similarity as George’s malignant action of shooting Lennie at the end of the novel was pressured by the threat of Curley and an apparent weakness for other’s suffering. George’s actions raised debate on how his response can be justified, however, also condemned. In support of George, he saved Lennie from a potential death at the hands of Curley, however in rejecting George’s actions, it was not definite that Curley was going to kill Lennie, but by shotting him,
Sometimes the right thing to do is not always the best thing. This theme showed true on many separate occasions such as setting Jim free, Huck deciding not to send Miss Watson a letter, lying about who he was, and running away from Pap’s cabin in the woods. This setting also added a questioning mood to the novel. The mood was very neutral because the reader never knew what event was going to happen next. The ups and downs of the story starting when Huck arrived at the Phelps’ home, to the time they realized Jim was a “good nigger” was very unpredictable.
They died so early and suddenly, that the ghost felt trauma. Therefore, its soul didn’t rest in peace and it came back. The second reason could be revenge. The ghost wanted to take revenge from his killer, as the killer hasn’t been punished for his crime yet.
This appears to be the only door, but i know from experiance that it isnt. There's hundreds of them: behind every one is a new fear, each more petrifying than the last. I took a step forward and immediately wished that i hadnt, an odour so vile and gut wrenching ,that it literally made me want to loose my sense of smell,
He is advised not go to the room, yet he persists that he will not believe in a ghost until it has physical defiance. Later on the young man is faced with the ghost, and finds out that there is more to the ghost than it first appears. In this essay I will write on the area under discussion of how the two writers of Red Room, and Monkeys Paw create suspense, and tension in each of their short stories. Both Monkey’s Paw & Red Room have similarities, and differences, and are based on the theme of Gothic Horror. Gothic Horror stories are usually filled with horror, and romance, and mostly have interactions with paranormal events.
The consequence of what will happen while wishes are made with “The Monkey’s Paw” at first is unknown. The family does not realize that wishing with the paw, is another test of what they were warned of from the beginning. The simian face that Mr. White see’s in the fire is an example of foreshadowing. In the story Mr. White says he saw the monkeys face in the dying fire. Also were spell is to represent the paw being evil.
In “The Monkey’s Paw”, the name of the house (Laburnam Villa) immediately creates a level of tension as laburnum is a poisonous plant. Verbs describing violent (“bawled”), nervous (“dangled”) and sudden (“snatched”) actions are used to create tension in part one. In part three verbs are used for similar effect, for example “started”, “flung”, “quivering”, “stammered”, and to create a sense of conflict (argument): the word “cried” is repeated 12 times, and Mr. and Mrs. White speak “wildly”, “fiercely” and “hysterically”. Furthermore, Mr. White refers to the revived Herbert as “it”, which shows that he thinks him to have become a walking, mindless corpse and brings in an element of
In Ursula Le Guin’s novel, A Wizard of Earthsea, the major theme is that no action is without consequence. This theme is demonstrated many times throughout the novel such as when Ged unwisely lets loose a shadow, when he makes the decision to hide from it, and when he realizes that his true mistake was not correcting his bad qualities when he had the chance. As a first consideration, Ged illustrates that no action is without consequence when he impetuously lets loose a shadow. This action occurs due to Ged’s arrogance, his pride, and his desire to prove himself. When Jasper, his rival, taunts him by suggesting that he is weak and inexperienced, Ged rashly conjures a spirit from the dead who brings with her a “shapeless clot of darkness”, the latter who attacks him and does him harm.