Monitors Pupil Teachers and Revised Code

293 Words2 Pages
Monitors were older children who supervised younger children at boards. However, there quality of teaching was not very good because of the lack of experience, they were unqualified and they had no lesson plans. As a result of no experience and no methods of teaching, they taught in a 'parrot fashion'. However it was the first steps towards teaching assistants and it helped the costs. Pupil Teachers Were older than monitors therefore more experienced. They were pupils by night but teachers by day. To maximise their performance they were examined therefore their quality of teaching was better. Also actual teachers planned pupil teachers lessons for them, however, as pupil teachers gained knowledge of the lessons, they began to understand the lessons they taught. Pupil Teachers had smaller classes which enabled them to teach better. As a result of the high quality of teaching, pupil teachers gained more respect by both other teachers and pupils. The revised code, which is also known as 'Payment by Results' was set up by a man called Robert Lowe in 1862 as a result of the Newcastle Commission which was formed in 1861 which was designed to save the government money but spot the holes in education. The revised code encouraged schools to produce better grades. This meant that the teachers focused on all the students not just the able students. However, it did have a negative effect, teachers sometimes cheated to get better grades so that they got a wage increase. This also caused schools to adapt to exams and inspections. Which then led on to introducing revision which is a massive part of education nowadays. The revised code also showed tax payers that their money wasn't being wasted and the government was using it
Open Document