Essay comparing essay (Mao and Gandhi) Both Mao and Gandhi were the key leaders in each of their countries, China and India. The means they adopted in order to alter each of their government’s regimes, which are rotten to the core, was totally different, even though they desired to occur quite similar things. The attempts they tried to carry out were various, such as economical, social and political reason. As following evidence shows. Firstly, in order to acquire the power economically, Gandhi utilized a spinning wheel and the traditional clothes of India to address their citizens not to purchase western clothes, which greatly contributes to Britain economy.
Michelle Smith HSC 1102 (Midterm paper Gandhi vs. King) March 18, 2013 Both Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. used a policy of nonviolent resistance to campaign for change. Instead of countering violence with violence against their aggressors, they chose to resist unfair laws and call for collective social reform by nonviolent methods such as boycotting. After the British forced the Indians to become dependent on British cloth imports, Gandhi led a complete Indian boycott of British clothes. Similarly, King later organized a complete boycott of buses to promote his cause until the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that segregation on public buses was unconstitutional. A major difference was that Gandhi campaigned against unjust laws of the British government, while Martin Luther King Jr. campaigned for rights that "colored" people were already lawfully supposed to have.
The portrayal of how citizens should triumph over an oppressive government and free the state from authoritarian shackles is a harshly debated topic both within academics and media. Hollywood, and other movie industries, generally adapts a more violent form of social movements and revolutions due to the fact that, generally, explosions & action scenes sell more than Indian workers on hunger strike. One of the newer blockbusters “V for Vendetta” had been fairly important icon many recent riots and social movements such as Arab Spring, Gezi Protests & Occupy Wall Street... Etc. In the movie, the main character,V, opposes the oppressive and authoritarian British government of 2020 (Smith 2006).
Propaganda Alex Carey believed that the growth of propaganda was to protect corporations from democracy. Carey also said that the Unites States have been a subject of propaganda for 3/4 of the century to expand the rights of corporations and to bypass democracy and destroy the unions. He also states that people won't listen to violence but you control there minds with the media. Carey explains that corporations have successfully used propaganda to destroy the unions because the media made the unions seem like a bunch of people rioting and picketing. When in reality the unions did not use violence.
Gandhi stood up and he became a leader to the people in India. He was unhappy with the foreign power in his home country. Also this is what happened with Nelson Mandela in South Africa fighting against the law of apartheid, to gain equal rights for the black majority in that country. This law prevented the blacks in South Africa to live a normal life. This all changed when Nelson Mandela decided to start fighting for the equal rights of the the blacks.
The ideology of nonviolence has come to play a major role in political struggles in the United States of America and, indeed, in nations around the world. Almost every organization seeking radical change in the USA has been targeted by organizers for the nonviolence movement. Organizations like Earth First!, which originally did not subscribe to the ideology of nonviolence, have since then adopted that ideology or at least its set of rules for protest and civil disobedience. Yet nonviolence activists have put little energy into bringing their creed to establishment, reactionary, or openly violent organizations. In this essay it will be argued that nonviolence encourages violence by the state and corporations.
Many different leaders and philosophers went through great strides as advocates for equality amongst all races and nationalities. There were many different approaches to acquiring and reaching that goal. Two activists, Mahatma Gandhi and Karl Marx, both impacted the socialistic and capitalist world through their methods. While Gandhi took on a more peaceful, non violent strategy when fighting for equality between India and the British, Marx was adamant that he would reach his final goal of Communism by any means possible, violence included. Ultimately, because Gandhi’s beliefs and tactics in incorporating those beliefs were based on religion and peaceful, non-violent protests, and Marx believed that violence and action would successfully end social classes in Europe, there is a very distinct difference between both men’s methods, yet they shared the same common goal: to do away with inequality.
Sir John Simon was the chairman. • However, political parties and social organizations nationwide accused the commission as an 'All-White Commission', and was rejected by them. This was followed by a strike in Bengal on February 3rd, 1928. Simon's arrival in the Calcutta was meted with demonstrations. • All-Party Conference was formed in May 1928 in Bombay for further boycotts.
In South Africa, he encouraged his Indian followers to defy laws that were designed to oppress them, by using non-violent civil disobedience. Gandhi and his followers suffered the result of such actions. Many people were, flogged or thrown in jail, and some were shot. However, as Gandhi had predicted, the public outcry forced the South African government to change its position. Gandhi as an Inspirational leader He was against categorization of people and reached out to
Mohandas Gandhi drew his inspirations from Henry David Thoreau; the author of “On the duty of Civil Disobedience” who is known as the founder of one of the powerful weapon known as Civil Disobedience. Therefore, he acted in a way that has not been seen before in the world. He responded to the British rule through Civil Disobedience. Putting everything together Mohandas Gandhi created his own concept of civil disobedience which is known as “satyagraha.” Satyagraha comes from Sanskrit meaning “truth force.” Indians were not allowed from the British to collect or sell salt. So he organized a campaign through satyagraha.