Models of Organized Crime Executive Summary

581 Words3 Pages
Models of Organized Crime Executive Summary The purpose of this document is to compose a statement of the main ideals in which Dena will link the differences between the bureaucratic and patron – client organizations. In fact, this document will speak of the similarities and differences between the dominate ideals of organized crime, and define why the models are significant for comprehending organized crime. Distinctions The patron – client system is a cluster of lawbreakers who trade knowledge, set up a system of elements of relationships with governmental and authorative bosses and gain access to a chain for the intention of helping group’s customers both politically and economically. The patron – client system commonly constructed using a ruling body strategy and made up of one dominate boss, a consultant, and other individuals. Requests moved to a lower position in a perpendicular situation with the highest supervisor and the lower individuals. In fact, associates of the patron – client systems are recruited. In addition, the patron – client systems are close beginning at the highest to the lowest levels. Furthermore, allowing the system members to go his or her way has a favorable chance to avoid the police, the progress, and procedures (Alves & Redlin, 2013). Bureaucratic systems are orderly and made up of governing action, laws, and orders that hold back individuals such as the patron – client systems from making judgments’ without official consent. According to WeeKoh (2009) this is what is known as the red tape rule where formal documentations processed by administration before any significance can be made p. one The patron – client system associates are allowed to get external means, connections, and manage tasks without acceptance but the tasks has to be helpful to the system. Moreover, individuals associated in the bureaucratic system fault
Open Document