If the score still remains tied, than both teams have to do a penalty shoot out. In my personal view I think this is not a good method to see whose better than the other, penalty shoot outs are mainly about luck, it is a fifty-fifty, just like how you would flip a coin. Meanwhile while resolution speakers believe that when a team when after they have worked hard and to their best, that’s a fair win for them. Fraleigh sees ties with no value because it does not show which contestant exceled to their best. Therefore, it contradicts the whole purpose of the game.
This personality trait would affect sporting performance if the performer was performing in a team game, the lack of confidence may put them off their game or they may not even get involved. Extroverts on the other hand tend to be confident and are most often found within team games, this trait can also lead to hot headedness and therefore deteriorate their performance in sport as they are no longer concentrated on the task at hand. This can also be said when they have to partake in a sport that involves small muscle movements (as extroverts tend to sway towards the use of large muscle movements) if they’re unable to perform the task at hand they may become aggressive and thus their performance will decrease. One further trait Eysenck indentified was a stable performer; a stable performer tends to be more laid back and has an even temper. In a performance situation this could lead to either laziness or complacency, with their mind wandering off task.
A team with a good tight end already has a huge advantage over the other team. Another reason why tight ends are able to dominate the league is because of their speed. You would think that if the tight end is too big to be covered by a cornerback than ill just put a linebacker on him. But this doesn’t seem to work because linebackers cannot keep up with the speed of tight end. Too big for defensive backs and too fast for linebackers.
Name Course Date Rational Choice Theory Rational choice theory, whose other name is reasoned action theory, refers to the efforts to give explanations on all social phenomena, both conforming as well as deviant, in terms of the manner in which self-interested individuals make their personal choice. The fundamental nature of the theory states that “when faced with several courses of action, people usually do what they believe is likely to have the best overall outcome” (Quackenbush 2004). These choices are always under the weight of their inclinations. Rational choice theory takes social exchange to be comparable to economic exchange where all parties involved make attempts at maximizing their benefit while mitigating the drawbacks. The primary assumption it holds is based on individualism.
Instrumentality refers to the individual’s belief that the expected performance will result in a reward. A successful leader will use instrumentality to his or her advantage to motivate an employee with the promise of rewards. It is important however, that the leader is consistent when giving promised rewards for performance. If an employee is promised a promotion or pay increase if a particular metric is reached, the leader will lose their credibility in this respect if he or she does not follow through with the reward. Valence refers to the value an individual places on the reward.
“If you can't beat 'em, join 'em”. This is a phrase is used to propose a final solution when you have been defeated by your adversary in a game, sport, or debate and especially when you are in teams. This phrase has been used too lightly and thus it should not be used as a solution, especially when you lose in any sort of competition. It is common for someone to lose to another opponent in any sort of competition, but that doesn’t mean that you should join the team right away. I state this because the phrase is more of a way of giving up, rather than being more confident on what you can do to be better than your adversary.
It isn’t the amount of muscle you have, skill, or pure strength that makes you a great athlete. It is how efficiently you can use your nervous system. The nervous system is the key to becoming an extraordinary athlete, but it can also hurt you. For example if you are born with a brain problem, like Lou Gehrig or Muhammad Ali you could be in trouble later in life. They both were born with a weakened substania nigra, a part of the brain that controls movement.
On the other hand if the Paralympic athletes were nearly blind and nothing could be done to enhance their sight they would be at a serious disadvantage compared to able bodied athletes. If there was a set of strict guidelines that determined what prosthetics Paralympic athletes could use and strict groupings a mix of able and non-able bodied athletes could work but it would be very hard and would need revisiting often due to advances in technology. Therefore I think it would be more practical to continue with the separation of able bodied and non-able bodied athletes. Some people might say that it is unfair for disabled people to be separated from everyone else but I believe that if they really believe that they should run a separate sporting event that accommodates all athletes together and then they will realise how hard it is to organise a massive event like the Olympics. In conclusion I think that the Paralympic and Olympic games should not be combined as it would not be fair on any of the athletes who are against others with better equitment to replace limbs or for example only seeing a quarter of the amount of stuff the others can
If we judge and label someone by appearance, we probably can’t learn special characteristics about someone because we don’t know about their belief and personality in appearance. Some people just hide their emotion and seldom express themselves by a verbal communication. Therefore, the “Squiggling game” is a good form of communication to allow us to know someone without judgment more. 250 words Additional material: Gordon Allport Prejudice jeopardizes to learn special characteristics about someone. As a result, we should find different ways to reduce prejudice.
When it comes to sports teams, they should act just as professionally as anyone else. In fact, they should act more professionally than others for the simple fact they have more youngsters looking up to them as role models. Unfortunately, many players do not act appropriately, and this does not help future generations. * Athletes should be mentors for how they play the sport, but, they should not be role models. Role models can be mentors but they can't really be role models can they?