Michael Mompellion Essay

861 Words4 Pages
‘Michael Mompellion’s most unsympathetic character flaw is his chilling lack of passion.’ Do you agree or disagree? Geraldine Brooks’ historical fiction ‘Year of Wonders’ explores the impact of adversity on the individual and social structure. Brooks’ novel takes an introspective insight into those affected by the Great Plague of mid-seventeenth century England. We enter the cyclic novel after the plague had run its course during “leaf-fall”; the season that signifies loss of innocence, foreshadowing death and the defeat of moral virtue. As the plague manifests through the village, so too do the hidden inner qualities of individuals. The plague brought out the best in a select number of characters while revealing wicked and damaging traits in others. Michael Mompellion is a complex character for he is arguably both heroic and deeply flawed, and the narration provided by protagonist Anna Frith while seemingly well-rounded is questionable on its reliability. Through Anna’s initially admiring description of Michael to a repulsed account of his character, Brooks invites readers to comprehend the character flaws that the narrator is blinded to. While some may argue that Michael’s greatest flaw is his lack of passion, it can also be said that his ‘God complex’ and hypocritical nature are his greatest defects. The claim that Michael’s exhibits a ‘chilling lack of passion’ is not necessarily true. While he did execute a heinous crime of not consummating his marriage with Elinor, it is clear that his intentions were decent and he only wished to help her as she was “in need of expiation”. His relationship with Anna demonstrates that Michael is not in fact lacking in passion or consideration. He is capable of being “tender” and “gentle” towards her and show true affection. Michael is undoubtedly passionate in his preaching and conviction in his beliefs. Furthermore,
Open Document