She also did not care to be like anyone, “She didn’t want to know how a thing was done, but how” said Beatty (Bradbury, 60). Clarisse was a curious girl and hurt for knowledge. But all of these traits noted her as anti- social, and was banned from school. But she knew she was not anti-social, she was really kicked out cause she was a threat. She didn’t fall into the governments trap and become
------------------------------------------------- Compare and contrast the two transcripts The speakers in these two transcripts differ in the way that Mrs Cook is very demanding and dominating. She is a strong speaker and she doesn’t let others take authority over her. It as though she thinks that she is the guest on the show and therefore she is the most important person on the show. However on the other hand, tom feels like he can’t talk to his parents about everything and anything. You can tell that in some ways he is the dominating person in the transcript as the topic of conversation revolves around him.
The thing that Hope was protecting Andy from was the voices in her head. She would hear the voices telling her that someone were going to take him or hurt him in some way. Hope had many problems because she did not have the parenting skills that she needed to take care of Andy. Hope needed people in her life to help her care for Andy and to tell her what she was doing right and what she was doing wrong. Social services should have removed Andy from her care because she could not care for him.
180). Mother Antonia is not naïve. She understands forgiveness is hard, but she is correct. If we don’t forgive, we cannot heal. If we cannot heal, we become sick, bitter and will always be stuck back at the event rather than living in the present.
Due to her domineering presence this meant that any chance that child A’s mother had of being able to fulfil her role as the primary carer was undermined and must have caused great stress and tension within the family unit. This is picked up on by the child who will often display negative behaviour just before a home visit in the hope that care staff will cancel it. This would remove the burden of saying she doesn’t want to go herself which she feels would be like rejecting her family. This finally leads me to the grandfather who would have been the only male to have been involved in child A’s development but he appears to have taken a very minor role and chose to stay in the background letting his domineering wife pull the family strings. This meant again that child A had no dominant male role model in her life and reinforced the grandmother’s matriarchal role.
I am not comfortable with her in this house any longer and even furthermore she does not do her job properly look at this house it is a mess and yet she is nowhere to be found. John: I don’t believe that is fully necessary but if that is what you want then fire her. Elizabeth: No John, I wish for you to do it, prove to me that you love me and not her. Fire her now John. John: Fine but this is it.
Nowadays people don’t hold themselves liable for their anger and blame someone or something for their own behavior. Enraged outbursts are likely to happen anywhere no place is exempt in this mad world. Hales states in her essay, “Three things responsible for this angry world are: time, technology, and tension.” When we’re running low on patience and all tensed up, we don’t recognize how we treat or talk to people. We have lost our tolerance for inconvenience. It’s a feeling of weakness that sparks our raving madness and being furious for a moment won’t do us any good.
In Mrs Jones situation she would not be willing to start a conversation with the other carer straight away, which will quickly change if the meeting is holding wrong information. This is when the team have dependence. However the group will then move on to the next stage which is Storming, because the group has disagreements about who is right and who is wrong there tends to be arguments. These will be based along the lines of if the abuse happened and if it was intentional or not. There will be a lot of disagreements and the both of them not willing to change their statements to agree on what actually has happened.
This then created a negative relationship between my coworker and me because I was not allowing her to do her job of teaching me. This negative relationship then closed off our communication line because of how I was stating things and not allowing Diane to do her job of properly training