Medea Do Not Act Rashly Analysis

735 Words3 Pages
Many people often go to an extreme rationale or act violently under certain circumstances. The saying, “do not act rashly,” is a universal theme, however emotional instability usually seems to defy this concept. For example, Euripides’ Medea portrays heartbroken princess Medea seeking revenge on her former husband, Jason, by killing the four people that are dearest to him. Therefore, Medea should be looked upon as a guilty, murderous woman. The following evidence includes an opening statement, witness testimonies, and a closing statement. Medea the princess of Colchis and former wife of Jason has a committed a crime so wretched it is practically unspeakable of. Hereby clarifying her indictment, Medea is charged with four counts of homicide.…show more content…
Medea is a guilty woman due to her rash actions. She is the murderer of a king, a newly wed woman, and two of her own children. Two witnesses, the Messenger and the Chorus, have actually observed parts of this unfortunate incident. The Messenger sees the dead bodies of King Creon and his daughter and the Chorus hears her children’s last words. They conclude that Medea is guilty and needs to be punished. Her intent is to see Jason suffer; therefore killing his father in law, wife, and two children. Nevertheless, he is obviously grieving these sorrows cast upon him. Medea’s wish is fulfilled, however it has cost her own family. This woman sacrifices her loved ones for revenge and hatred. Would anyone want a person of such corrupt morals living in this world? Medea should be found guilty due to the fact that she murdered four innocent people. In conclusion, Medea is to be found a guilty woman through the opening statement, two witness testimonies, and a closing statement. This case displays the consequences of being irrational. Many situations throughout life will seem very tough, but never should anyone react as poorly as Medea
Open Document