5. Compute a linear least-squares-fit of the calibration data and plot the resulting line on the same graph as the calibration data. Comment on the linearity of the pressure transducer and scannivalve. Part 3: Calibration of the Tunnel 1. Connect the micromanometer (calibrated in Part 2) across the wind-tunnel contraction in order to measure the static pressure drop.
Use the report pages below to record your data. Answer questions A-G found on pages 46 and 47. Name: _________________________ Lab 2 Report Data: Data Table 1: Length Measurements | Object | Length (cm) | Length (mm) | Length (m) | CD or DVD | 12.1 cm | 121 mm | .121 m | Key | 5.1 cm | 51 mm | .051 m | Spoon | 16.1 cm | 161 mm | .161 m | Fork | 18.5 cm | 185 mm | .185 m | NOTE: The instructions indicate to measure the objects to “one degree of uncertainty.” The degree of uncertainty is a property of the instrument used. All three recorded values will have the same precision. On page 29 is the explanation of uncertainty.
2. Design Entry and simulation of sequential logic circuits (counters, PRBS generators, accumulators). Test bench creation, functional verification, and concepts of concurrent and sequential execution to be highlighted. 3. Synthesis, P&R and Post P&R simulation for all the blocks/codes developed in Expt.
Make sure the launch range is clear of any obstructions. 2. Using the Plumb Bob and sticky note, mark the floor underneath the launch point. Measure the height of the launch point using the metric ruler once per person and take an average. 3.
Then drew two intersecting lines perpendicular to each other. 2. Using the protractor I drew the angles of incidences or rays measuring 10°, 20°, 30°, 40°, 50° and 60°. 3. Then I drew a semi-circle on the top of the intersection representing the flexi glass and placed the flexi glass over the semi-circle.
AP Physics C Lab Report i. Purpose: To investigate the relationship in Newton’s Second Law ii. Materials: Pasco track and cart, endstop, pulley, string, washers, lab pro with motion detector, logger pro iii. Procedure: 1. Assemble the materials as shown in the diagram to the left.
Once done we then did the same thing but going counterclockwise. This gave us the Angles of Reflection. FromThe two Angles of Reflection we were able to calculate the average Angles of Reflection, listed in Table 1. For the Law of Refraction, we replaced the mirror with a Acrylic cylindrical lens. We rotated the ray table clockwise by increments of 10̊ again.
Because the length of a pendulum L, and the square of the period of the pendulum T2 are directly proportional, we were able to determine g by calculating the slope of the T2 vs L graph. From our calculations, this value turned out to be 10.3m/s2, while the accepted value for the acceleration is 9.8m/s2. Percentage Difference = 10.3−9.8 9.8 = 5.10 % There are a few reasons for the small error in our estimation: 1. There was some uncertainty in measuring the length of the pendulum L.
Usually the experimenter adjusts the direction of the three forces, makes measurements of the amount of force in each direction, and determines the vector sum of three forces. Forces perpendicular to the plane of the force board are typically ignored in the analysis. In order to complete this lab we used a force table, accessories, level,standard weights. And weight hangers. In order to complete the first lab we had to level the table and connect the rings to the pulleys.
 Precision: measure of how close a series of measurements are to one another.  Accepted Value: the correct value based on reliable references  Experimental Value: the value measured in the lab.  Error: o Error = experimental value – accepted value  Percent error: o Percent Error = |error| x 100% Accepted value  Significant Figures: all of the digits that are known, plus a last digit that is estimated. o