In deciding how to account for an unusual or unique transaction for financial reporting purposes, should one consider the tax treatment applied to the transaction? 3. Did Peat Marwick have a right to change its position on the proper accounting treatment for the stock redemptions? What factor or factors may have been responsible for Peat Marwick’s decision to change its position regarding these transactions? Facts In 1983, GEICO announced plans to purchase several million shares of its outstanding common stock for $60 per share.
Suppose Arbuckle made a surprise announcement that it would do a share repurchase rather than pay a special dividend. b. What net tax savings per share for an investor would result from this decision? c. What would happen to Arbuckle’s stock price upon the announcement of this change? Problem 17-19 on Dividend Capture Strategy based on Chapter 17 Payout Policy Que Corporation pays a regular dividend of $1 per share.
(e.g., 32.16)) You purchase a bond with a coupon rate of 7.7 percent and a clean price of $1,030. If the next semiannual coupon payment is due in two months, what is the invoice price? | | $1,019.67 | | $1,045.33 | | $1,055.67 | | $1,101.24
The company could sell a new issue of 25-year bonds at an annual interest rate of 11.67% in today's market. A call premium of 14% would be required to retire the old bonds, and flotation costs on the new issue would amount to $3 million. NYW's marginal tax rate is 40%. The new bonds would be issued when the old bonds are called. What will the after-tax annual interest savings for NYW be if the refunding takes place?
| | | = | $787,526.87 | Rounded as last step | b)This is not correct. The investor sold the security 39 days later. To calculate the sale price, the maturity value of the Note must be discounted from its maturity date back to the date of sale. The period of the time line that we are interested in is from the maturity date (time 123 days) back to the sale date (time 39 days). Note also that the interest rate we must use is a simple discount rate.
Case study: Another example “Explain how a two-year bill facility that uses 90-day bills poses interest rate risk for the borrower. Describe FRAs, BAB futures and interest rate swaps and explain how they can be used to hedge the interest rate risk involved in a planned issue of BABs. Demonstrate how each hedge instrument establishes the company’s cost of funds.” Businesses often require funds for a longer term than the usual 90-day term of a bill and so will be provided with a bill facility. This is an agreement to rollover bills on their maturity date by issuing a replacement set of bills, however there is potential that borrowers will be exposed to interest rate risk. Interest rate risk is basically the threat posed by unexpected changes in interest rates, in other words, it can be defined as the uncertainty surrounding expected returns on security, brought about by changes in interest rates.
Question: : (TCO D) A company issues $5,000,000, 7.8/%, 20-year bonds to yield 8% on January 1, 2010. Interest is paid on December 31. The proceeds from the bonds are $4,901,036. Using effective-interest amortization, how much interest expense will be recognized in 2010? 15.
The current liabilities are what is owed and is expected to be paid off on one year. The long term liabilities are what are owed for a longer period of time that may include interest. • What were the company’s revenues (or net revenues) for the last 3 annual reporting
Dividends and dividend equivalent rights declared | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | (10,676 | ) | | | 0 | | | | (10,676 | ) | Repurchase of common stock | | | (46,976 | ) | | | 0 | | | | (22,950 | ) | | | 0 | | | | (22,950 | ) | Share-based compensation | | | 0 | | | | 2,253 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 2,253 | | Common stock issued under stock plans, net of shares withheld for employee taxes | | | 6,981 | | | | (143 | ) | | | (444 | ) | | | 0 | | | | (587 | ) | Tax benefit from equity awards, including transfer pricing adjustments | | | 0 | | | | 1,232 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 1,232 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Balances as of September 28, 2013 | | | 899,213 | | | $ | 19,764 | | | $ | 104,256 | | | $ | (471 | ) | | $ | 123,549 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
First, if the government increases its purchases but keeps taxes constant, it increases demand directly. Second, if the government cuts taxes or increases transfer payments, households’ disposable income rises, and they will spend more on consumption. This rise in consumption will in turn raise aggregate demand” (Weil, 2008, para. 4). Consumer income has a huge effect on aggregate supply and demand just as the aggregate supply and demand can affect consumer income.