However it can be seen that the governments power and authority could be the main reason as to why Chartism failed in short term to achieve it’s many aims. Chartism was the first national movement in Britain which the state feared would become a successful revolution. the chartists had a vast number of followers and supporters but their strength was nothing compared to that of the state. many of the chartist were from working class background and were illiterate and living in poverty. While the government has their constables and professional police which often consisted of the middle class.
I always knew that the more money you have means the more power you have; but I never really knew how it was structured. America is an capitalist country. So I learned how the hierarchy of power and wealth dictates how the country is ran. I also learned about the how the military plays a part of the power elite. Who are the power elite?
They created a world where a few families owned most of the wealth. To strengthen ties & harness control of everything,..they strategically married into other wealthy powerful, families. They created laws to protect their wealth & power & appointed people to enforce the laws that would ensure they maintained their grasp on the control of everything & everyone. 3. Describe the disproportionate distribution of wealth in Boston, Philadelphia, and New York.
As it altered social expectations, it led to demands that the vote be extended to a larger portion of the population and that public offices be elected by the people rather. During and after the revolution, smaller forms and artisan and laborers began increasingly to participate in state legislative elections. In Jacksons Turner Mains “Government by the People which appeared in Volume 23 of William and Mary Quarterly has clearly shown statistically that the government officials increased. The Revolution also created a government in which you no longer necesarly had to be born into a prodigious and wealthy family to make a change in the government officials increased. In other word , leaders in the new government were less worthy, and less likely to be connected by marriage and kinship then those before the
Examples, Business Marketing Association (BMA), and Congressional Budget Office (CBO), are insider groups that are more powerful and are practically the part of the establishment. They are able to work closely and elect selected officials in the central and local government. It is not always an advantage since is it deliberated upon those with generally likeminded views to the government of the day. The limitations of the pluralist theory examples include optimism, social, political, economic capitol and overly contingent on the power of competition. Elitist Theory of Power and elitism Analyzed In all cultures and political organizations there is a small class of existence that include rulers and ones’ that make decisions.
Centralized vs. decentralized governments are huge differences between these civilizations. Also geography, concept of good citizen, and emphasis on power of man are differences. Both Han and Athens saw social class distinctions as normal. They didn’t think having different levels of social class was anything but customary (document 2 and 3). In documents 2 and 3 you can easily tell that event the population is divided into social class going from the top of the class to the bottom.
This is an exception in under-developed countries such as India where a caste system is still present. Priestland’s belief is that through studying the past and how society functioned, we can understand and solve current day economic and social issues. The middle class has become the dominant factor in how most countries operate and succeed especially in the United States. After reading Merchant Soldier Sage: A New History of Power, I too am a strong believer in studying the past and how it has created the world as we know it and the world to come. Works Cited: Priestland, David.
A political model that that fits the book’s political beliefs would be majoritarianism. Majoritarians believe that decisions should be made by a numerical majority of its members, in other words, decisions in the US should be made by the whole country, not the few in Congress and the House that decide what laws are passed and who are influenced by monetary bonuses from outside sources. This would be the most efficient way to handle our politics, that way everyone has a say, instead of the rich doing what’s right for the rich and leaving the middle and lower social class struggling. The pluralist model does not relate to the book at all. Pluralists believe that that politics and decision making is located within the government and outside sources have no influence on the government, which is a lie since interest groups an election fundraising exists.
2012 Junior Achievement Essay How can the country readily and realistically tackle growing income disparity? There is no simple solution to this ‘problem’; many people do not even consider income inequality to be an issue. Most people have grown up with a mental knowing that if you work hard, you’ll be successful. The easiest solution would be a communist nation; however that is not a realistic approach. Personally, I do not think we should fix income inequality, but my strongest idea would be what I call a “wealth cap.
America’s distribution of power is one thing that separates from other countries. While most countries’ power comes solely from one central government, ours is divided up amongst many irregular authorities. Many claim that this division of power is what keeps America being the only remaining superpower. The power is allocated between things like economy and even unusual things like conformity and or gangs. It is not unusual to hear a discussion about the influence that economics has on Americans.