In Martin Luther King’s acceptance speech for the noble peace prize, he articulates that nonviolence is a perfect answer to the crucial political and more question of our time- the need for man to overcome oppression and violence without resorting to violence and oppression. Individuals of the black race were patronized and attacked due to racial injustice. MLK created a notion of nonviolence in order to end this injustice. He emphasizes that demonstrating a nonviolent demeanor is a much powerful force, which allows social transformation. However in order for social transformation to exist we must all develop a mentality/lifestyle that rejects revenge, aggression and retaliation.
They were for slavery because of the finical gain. The labor they didn’t have to do and taxes. They were against slavery because they felt that the government couldn’t control the importation of slavery. The position that the Connecticut delegates and Mr. Heath in the Massachusetts debate took in the lead role of not participate in the slave trade. This was done by prohibiting the importation of slaves.
As “elected president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC), he was often seen as a rival to the NAACP. (Royson)” Martin Luther later became part of the NAACP. It was an organization that would help colored people earn their civil rights. His protests were anti-violent, because he believed there was no win through a physical war. The only way to win was with the help of God, because he created man as equal.
Malcolm X's approach to attaining freedom for African Americans was almost impossible. He wanted to separate blacks from whites, and have African Americans be the first class citizens. He basically wanted a kind of elevated segregation. He demonstrates this in this quote "When white people are evenly divided, and black people have a bloc of votes of their own, it is left up to them to determine who's going to sit in the White House and who's going to be in the dog house. " Martin Luther King Jr. approach to attaining freedom for African Americans was through peaceful protest.
"Now is the time to lift our nation from the quicksands of racial injustice to the solid rock of brotherhood" (King). This quote, from Martin Luther King Jr.’s famous I Have a Dream speech, is about working towards racial equality so that the people can live together in peace and unity. Mohandas Gandhi worked towards India’s independence from Britain’s rule, while Martin Luther King Jr. worked to end segregation. While the two functioned towards two different goals, their tactics were both inspired by Henry David Thoreau. “On Civil Disobedience” by Mohandas Gandhi, an excerpt from “Letter from Birmingham City Jail” by Martin Luther King Jr., and an excerpt from “Civil Disobedience” by Henry David Thoreau, all show how all three of them have similar views towards civil disobedience.
King begins with acquiesce, an extreme behaviour with which the oppressed do nothing to fight injustice. He references the biblical story of Israelites slaves, some of whom chose to remain slaves rather than fight for their freedom. As a Baptist minister, King would be familiar with preaching humility as a Christian value, but in this writing he says that those who humbly accept wearing the “yolk of oppression” (2-2) are just as immoral as the system which allows them to be oppressed. King is stating that we are all equal, and allowing hatred and injustice to pass unchecked is only creating a “negative freedom” (2-4). He then moves to the contrast of acquiesce; violence.
Chiefly, Mandela’s “Inauguration Speech” suggests that everyone is apart of each other, thus proving there needs to be harmony in a relationship of grievance. All these successful individuals, similarly, imply the philosophy of Ubuntu: advocating mutual understanding, rather than vengeance. It is evident, indeed, that the notion of Ubuntu is essential when moving forward from estrangement. In Martin Luther King, Jr.’s speech, “I Have a Dream”, the notion of Ubuntu is undoubtedly demonstrated through his portrayal of what real redemption looks like, one that is based upon reconciliation. First, Martin Luther King, Jr. exhibits the concept of Ubuntu when dismissing the idea of revenge.
Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X Rhetorical Analysis Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were two principal leaders of the African-American people, fighting for their people’s freedom and justice. Although the priorities of these two historical icons are one, their approaches toward it are distinct, as shown in their literary works. Upon Dr. King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail” and “I Have a Dream” speech, his major argument is that all men should be treated equally, for all men are created equally, and that this, which is his “dream,” shall be done in a peaceful manner. In his “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” Dr. King asks, “Isn't this like condemning a robbed man because his possession of money precipitated the evil act of robbery?” in response to segregationists’ claims that a black man fighting for his rights causes violence. In asking this rhetorical question, Dr. King refutes one’s such claim, and shows that violence is not a result of a black man’s struggle for his rights, but rather the result is one that usually comes within a person’s life: freedom.
Mlk or Malcolm X The two most prominent figures during the civil rights acts of the 1960’s, were Martin Luther King and Malcolm X. These two men were pertinacious in fighting for racial equality for African Americans and all colored people; they both sought to tackle their common problem through the teachings, and doctrines they had been taught. Unfortunately, they had different strategies in achieving the social and economic equality they dreamed of, MLK preached nonviolent civil disobedience and the complete integration of society while Malcolm X fought to keep society segregated, but did not want the whites controlling anything the blacks did. MLk’s teaching was most effective and surpassed Malcolm X in achieving the desired goals because it was more accepted by society and it happened in a nonthreatening manner. MLK advocated for civil disobedience and positive tensions within a community to create a basis for negotiation.
Augustine did believe though that people can overcome sin through choosing to be morally right and follow the teachings of Jesus Christ. Evil is the free-will of each human to turn away from good. Not simply choosing evil, because evil is not a thing, but choosing to not do what is right. So for any person or Christian to overcome sin, they must continue to live as Christ did and have the will to do what is right. Augustine’s role for Grace in