Explain. [Bannister v. Bemis Co. , 556 F.3d 882 (8th Cir.2009)] Case brief: Bemis Co, breached the covenant not to compete, the breach was material. Bannister could not accept employment with a Bemis competitor, but Bemis was to pay Bannister his salary. There was no term for a partial release. Bemis “released” Bannister to seek employment with one exception—Mondi Packaging.
sd HFT 3603 – Hospitality Law, Spring 2012 MOCK TRIAL – Mr. Chow (and his restaurants) vs. Philippe Chau (and his restaurants and partners) This case is based upon an actual incident, but is changed to simplify the facts and law for the purpose of our Mock Trial. The case is still under review by the courts. There is no right decision. Facts of the Case: Facts are presented by the attorneys during the Mock Trial. The case involves Philippe Chau, who was employed in Mr. Chow’s restaurants for 25 years, then left to open his own restaurants.
Unit 6 Case Study LS501: Ethics and the Professional Karen Sweeney April 19, 2012 MEMO To: The File From: Ima Lawyer Date: April18, 2012 Re: Last Meeting As the General Counsel for ABC Company, I attend confidential planning meetings with ABC’s executives. At a recent meeting, Charles, ABC’s Chief Operating Officer, revealed the tanks at the waste-water storage facility were leaking. If the water is not released from the tanks, they could explode. Until Maintenance can repair the leak, the company’s best option is to dump highly toxic water into the sewer system to relieve the pressure on the tanks. He also wants to keep the leak and the plan to discharge confidential.
Brook Antonio GEC 100/ Sharon Corbin W3D1 Article Analysis My first article is titled "Jay-z can fight racial profiling in retail." It's an article written from a commentary stand point by Roxanne Jones; former ESPN president, and co-author of "Say It Loud: An Illustrated History of the Black Athlete." Roxanne Jones is expressing her opinions related to rapper Jay-Z's affiliation to the luxury store Barney's. Barney's is in the middle of a racial profiling lawsuit. Roxanne states, “two Barney’s customers, Trayon Christian and Kayla Phillips, said last week that they were racially profiled and detained by police after making expensive purchases."
As the battle continues: USA vs. FDA Jason Murph Baker College With interest of the big investors Americans are kept in the background of the primary focus from the FDA. This is the claim made Gary Null in the documentary “The War on Health”. The history of Null’s credibility comes from his profession in Dietetics-Nutrition. He is also a talk show host for Progressive Radio Network (PRN.fm). Null owns Gary Null & Associates, a company that markets dietary supplements as well as a health food store in New York City In 2010, Null claimed that he was sickened and nearly killed by his own dietary supplements.
2) That Wal-mart intruded physically or otherwise, without permission, invitation, or valid consent upon the solitude of David Clark- which in this case he told them they could check and see that he did not have any fishing equipment, but they went further then what they were suppose to and intruded on his personal environment. 3) That the interference with
EST1 Task 1 James Duffield Western Governors University I will be evaluating the following information given from your company on its attitude toward social responsibility and giving your company recommendations as I see fit: Your company is a small local grocery store chain located in a major metropolitan area. You have closed a couple stores in high crime areas of the city. You also report the closed stores were losing money. After years or requests your company is stocking a small amount of health and organic products in all of your stores all of which are high margin items. Also, your company was asked for donations of day old products by the food bank.
Contrary to the District’s contention, the record also does not show that the Association indicated that it could not beat the savings under a subcontract. In support of its contention, the District submits that the Association’s chief negotiator (Mr. Kurtz) admitted to the District’s business administrator (Mr. Richards) that the Association could not meet the terms of the subcontract and that the Association did not request further negotiations after the District declared an impasse. According to Mr. Richards, however, Mr. Kurtz said, “Yes, the numbers, they’re showing a savings for the District” (N.T. 145), which is hardly an indication that the Association could not beat the savings under the subcontract. Mr. Richards also testified that Mr. Kurtz “didn’t feel that the Association could, in fact, come up with that type of savings, but the negotiations still had to move forward.” Id.
They were proposing to become the exclusive distributor to Major. On June 22, 1965, Nalley’s home office in Washington made a decision not to distribute Major’s products, refusing to give a reason. No final agreement was ever executed between the parties. “In his trial testimony Gardiner stated that he had always had ‘lurking’ in his mind questions about Major being able to operate successfully” (Cole, 1972). Immediate efforts by Major to secure other distribution for its products proved unsuccessful.
After almost a year and half, Jerry Baldwin and Gordon Bowker, his former employers, offered to sell to him their Starbucks stores. Schultz took on the challenge and began to raise money to buy them out. He collected $3.8 million. After winning a very close battle with another potential buyer, he went ahead and combined his vision of a coffee shop with that of what was already present in the well known Starbucks stores- and so he kept the name and began the Starbucks Coffee Company that we all know and love today. The journey to success, however, was not without its obstacles.