Colorado is one of the only states in the Union that does not support Jessica’s Law, or the safety of children. The fact that these Liberal states won’t take a law like this seriously just shows the way our country is heading. It is clear that frivolous issues such as the legalization of marijuana are far more important to Colorado than the safety of children or else they would pass Jessica’s law and stop making excuses about their laws being tough enough. Colorado is now a place where sex offenders and perverts flock, over 10,000 of them in that state alone; and sadly, the number keeps growing (Gidenko). Again this number could be even higher, but due to the fact their law does NOT require them to register, how do law abiding citizens of that great state know?
As a result, immigration policy has lost its independent polity agenda. [Therefore,] virtually no new immigration policies have been created separated from terrorism policies since 2001.” Particularly, illegal immigration has overlapped with growing concerns about national security. The first official immigration initiative by the US government since 9/11 was the enactment of the Real ID Act in 2005. This new legislation required that drivers’ licenses issued by states had to conform to national standards, thereby making it difficult for illegal immigrant s from obtaining the licenses without having to prove their legal status and residency in the US. This legislation, however, proved to have many loopholes around it for illegal immigrants to obtain drivers’ licenses regardless of their illegal status because the states were not obliged to conform to the standards.
The death penalty is our harshest punishment. ... Further, maldistribution inheres no more in capital punishment than in any other punishment. ... Many nondecisive issues are associated with capital punishment. ... We cannot know whether the murderer on death row suffers more than his victim suffered; however, unlike the murderer, the victim deserved none of the suffering inflicted.
The law was also adapted in order to get more violent individuals off of the street, instead it filled the prisons with nonviolent, low priority felons. In North Carolina a habitual felon is defined as "any person who has been convicted of or pled guilty to three felony offenses in any federal or state court
He is very experienced in criminal law and is against mandatory sentencing. This journal presents information that the mandatory sentencing policy in the U.S. is a failure. It argues that Legislators thought that they could “get tough on crime,” especially drug crime. I feel this source gives educated reasons as to why drug policy needs to be changed. It also backs up my other sources with the same research results; by removing the sentencing discretion of judges, and replacing it with mandatory jail sentences, we are sending more offenders to prison instead of programs designed to rehabilitate.
These laws have affected society as previous laws regarding one punch assaults caused controversy within the NSW society and government. Previous laws stated that only two years minimum and eight years maximum in gaol were spent under the law and this caused families of one punch victim’s immediate law reform to ensure hefty prison sentences for offenders. The minimum year’s penalty spent in prison is seen as an unruly law as families of one punch victims who faced the fatality of death say that “eight years in gaol does not equal the amount of years of the life that they have taken”. This has caused widespread disgust within societies standards regarding the loss of another person’s life. This needs to be changed to adequately fit the standards of society and to regulate the values of Australia’s people.
The Act was passed a month after 9/11 and some people it was some what rushed. There are many issues with the Patriot Act that strongly violates citizens rights. Many were arrested for no reason without any charges filed against them, and to make things worse they were never given a fair trial. The majority of the procedures law enforcement take to protect the public are done by following the law, but the Patriot Act clearly violates their rights but nothing can be done to stop
Anyone who has ever been convicted of a sex offense against someone under the age of 18 cannot live within 2000 feet of a day care center, licensed in home day care provider, or school. This law is being tried by the Iowa Civil Liberties Union because they feel that this law is not fair for these sex offenders. These laws have been in use since July of 2002 and are now being tried. Iowa has been trying to track sex offenders for 50 years and could not figure out a way to do so efficiently, so they came up with the Iowa sex offender residency law in 2002. In November 2005, the US Supreme Court refused to review Iowa's sex offender residency law.
Both men had spent many years behind bars, and were incarcerated and paroled multiple times. Neither man was convicted of a violent crime; however their repeated, blatant disregard for the law should have indicated to authorities that there was a propensity for escalation in their crimes. The fact that two career criminals were allowed to go back out into society, despite having been convicted of multiple offenses, was instrumental in the deaths of Dr. Petits’ wife and two daughters. Had Hayes and Komisarjevsky been behind bars, this heinous crime would have undoubtedly been prevented. This very example proves that parole is a dangerous risk to take, even when considering non violent
When obviously they do not accept it by themselves? The point is the death penalty should not be abolished since it is the only way to stop criminals from killing, and hurting others. “The federal government and most states (38) in the USA have the death penalty. Some states rarely use it. Other states, however, are known as big users of the death penalty.