Support individuals to manage continence 1 Understand factors that affect management of continence Explain how difficulties with continence can affect an individuals self esteem,health and their day to day activities. Incontinence can affect a person mentally as well as physically and have a negative effect on the persons self esteem which can cause social embarrassment,isolation,distress and depression. Incontinence can restrict a person activities with fear of an accident in public which can cause humiliation,embarrassment. 1.2 List common causes of difficulties with continence Hysterectomy painful bladder syndrome pregnancy and childbirth ageing Enlarged prostrate prostatitis bladder cancer bladder stones 1.3 Explain how an individuals personal beliefs and values may affect the management of incontinence An individuals beliefs and values may affect the management of continence it may be that an individual values and beliefs may lead them to request clinical procedures which others may feel are not in their best interests, they may also refuse treatment which would benefit them. Modesty is greatly valued in some religions and cultures which may prevent them from seeking help.
1. How would you define “Frozen Preferences” and what is the impact of this concept on strategy formulation, alternative analysis and recommendation? • Managers don’t like to make major strategic changes once decisions have been made (except in the case of overwhelming evidence) as they will look unprepared and ineffective and their creditability is damaged • Frozen preferences o Management has made a decision and over time analysis shows that their decision may not be the best choice o However they feel compelled to maintain their current strategy even if it is not the best course of action. • As management preferences becomes a larger part of the organization (personnel changes, budgets etc), it becomes more and more difficult to change direction. o A tendency to avoid reversing changes even if it was not the best choice o In reality, past expenditures are sunk costs and the organization should use a clean slate to look at new choices, but to the manager, this will come at great personal loss.
The main factor of the framework interrelates in a very specific way, all the information has to be carefully calculated and reviewed to determine what the endpoints will be. All information reviewed can lead to an endpoint and the mangers have to make sure that all information is considered., endpoint to endpoint will paint a picture of what the risk
Crisis Management may be defined as the process of preparing for and responding to an unpredictable negative event to prevent it from turning into an even bigger problem, or becoming a full-blown, widespread, life-threatening disaster. It involves the execution of well-coordinated actions to control the damage and preserve or restore confidence in the system under crisis. Risk management, on the other hand, is a process for identifying, assessing, and prioritizing risks of different kinds. Once the risks are identified, the risk manager will create a plan to minimize or eliminate the impact of negative events. Common risks include things like accidents in the workplace or fires, tornadoes, earthquakes, and other natural disasters.
This is threatening because it creates a fear of the unknown future as well as failures. Change can also be annoying if someone else is trying to tell us how to do our job better when the existing way of doing business may have suited us just fine. To effectively and efficiently implement change, it is therefore important to understand the reasons why individuals resist change. I will briefly describe the four common reasons for resistance to change and then discuss methods for overcoming resistance to change2. Reasons for resistance to change Resistance to change is a reaction.
The organization needs to consider how its activities will influence others and good results. In the detailed analysis it alludes to organizations who sidestep the law by offering the items independently and later join them to make the item that is illicit, despite the fact that this could be viewed as lawful it is just a terrible good decision. It is ethically wrong to settle on a decision to ensure one gathering of individuals while disregarding the wellbeing of an alternate, which is precisely what happens at the present time
Individual Assignment Crisis Intervention BSHS 471 Randall Norris Ph.D. Crisis Intervention Having a crisis can be a challenging situation for many people this is why it is important to have an intervention plan in place when disaster strikes. What is a Crisis? What is a crisis? A crisis is a disruption or breakdown in a person’s normal or usual pattern of functioning, (WA, Crisis 2013). A crisis cannot be resolved by a person’s customary problem-solving resources/skills.
08 Fall 08 Fall DECISION MAKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY jUNE 26, 2014 Abstract Decision-making under uncertainty requires decision makers that have the ability and knowledge to choose objectively and decide upon the best alternative. Uncertainty and risk are an inherent part of our business world. Confident and well thought out decision-making can make the difference between a successful and a thwarted organization. Risky situations, complex alternatives and uncertainty warrant a carefully planned out systemic approach, which will list alternatives, strategies, and the probabilities of outcomes. Applying these techniques and understanding that the best decision is one based on what we choose to perceive as the best choice given the information and circumstances.
This could in turn be damaging to the reputation of the team and its members. In order to be successful, there is need for risk management incentives to be put in place. This can only be attained through the maintenance of good functionality for systems. A risk management plan involves coming up with the right techniques to cope with any challenges that are to be experienced in the planning process. For instance, certain alternatives should be indicated as a fall back plan in case the team runs out of resources away from home.
Applying the line of fit concept to operations strategy implementation helps a company or the implementation team to determine if the alignment between the requirements of the market and the company’s operation resources capabilities has been or is been achieved. Implementation of operations strategy can be a period of high risk. This can be mainly attributed to the fact that implementation typically involves making internal changes to the organization in terms of structure, control systems and other organizational features and also dealing with changes in the external environment (Reed & Buckley, 1988). These changes have the potential to affect the balance between the market requirements and operations resource capabilities and introduce the element of risk during the implementation phase. Most importantly