To justify this action the officer may say to themselves that they are making society safer, and never accept the true reality that they have committed a crime to achieve a desire that was never attainable in the first place because there will always be some criminals that get away. This may be because of some connections they have within the legal system, or even because of a mishap on the officer’s behalf that violated a right that they have under the Constitution. Regardless it is impossible to get every “bad guy” off of the street, and the officer themselves has become one of the “bad guys” in hopes that they will achieve a desire by using illegal means. Another instance of noble cause corruption may fall into the area of intelligence- led policing and come in the form of fourth amendment violations in an effort to contain society’s terrorists, and criminals. In this instance an officer may search someone’s home based on SARs which is a suspicious activity report which does not establish probable cause to take the action of searching a person home, and he or she may do so without
These officers took matters to a level they never should have considered let alone followed through with. The ethical decision in this dilemma was made by a third party individual, a cadet, who reported this incident. An alternative course of action in this case would have been to follow procedure and keeping their cameras on. Had this happened then all this mess would have been avoided and an individual wouldn’t have gotten hurt. Another alternative course of action would have been for the chief and department to answering the questions from the media instead of refusing to speak to them.
There could be a million reasons as to why a person commits a crime. At the end of the day it all comes back to that person personal choice. This doesn’t mean that they don’t know right from wrong. This simply means that they don’t believe that they will be caught and if they are caught, they don’t believe that they would do major time for their crime. I want to bring up specific deterrence.
Kristazsa Allong Colorado Technical University September 16, 2013 When looking into this scenario, there is so much that could have been wrong with the way the officers handled the situation. There of course is the natural instinct to want to protect everyone and to do your job, but remembering at the same time that people do have rights is something that cops tend to forget at times. (Reuters, 2013, p. 1) A lot of factors can come into play when looking at the law suit that was filed for having his civil rights violated. The factors on race, force of the officers, and lack of information could all end up with him winning the trail. The fact that they went after the gentleman solely on his race of what the lady believed looked to him
This is because no one stood up and tried to put an end to it even though they knew that it was wrong. This all begins with the commissioner, who is the leader. He should have set the example that using steroids was wrong and fought to implement strong rules against it from the start. The league did not have proper testing even when they knew that the use of steroids was an issue. Without rewards to those who did not use steroids it sent a message that players could use them and would not be severely punished.
Also Venkatesh said he would have liked to see the perspective of the police and why they didn’t do anything of the violence. Since he got in the wrong foot of some of the officers, he didn’t have good connections with them. Also not to offend and make it seem like he was just using Jt and community he didn’t ask some Straight- forward question that he would of wanted to ask. There were some limitations but Jt helped him through everything and meeting the right
As an example, a grocery store clerk who reports the father from the previous example to the police would be in violation of utilitarian ideology, but would find approval in virtue ethics. By reporting the father he is being an excellent employee to the grocery store and also improving society by reducing crime, passing the tests for both ethics and morality by virtue ethics standards. In the next example we will see how the same situation could unfold differently. Using the previous two examples, utilitarianism and virtue ethics provided conflicting viewpoints on similar issues. Deontological ethics bases itself upon performing a duty because it itself is inherently right without any
However, the incident would have been avoided if simple policies were in place. Had the officers followed and observed, or followed and attempted a routine traffic stop, the situation would have had a different
Current NFL player Bernard Pollard said this on the subject “30 years from now I don’t think it will exist. I could be wrong. Its just my opinion … there’s going to come a point where fans are going to get fed up with this.” (Boren 2) Other players have spoken out against rule changes in the NFL and how it is affecting the game. That just goes back to the nature of football. They all want to be rough and tough but never want to stop and think about their lives after football.
I found this to be true and did not say anything to gain my spot back with the hopes of keeping a scene from breaking out. I figured that if anyone had the guts to be that rude then they had the guts to do anything. By this time I was thoroughly irritated with the situation at hand, but did not want it to be the reason that my day turned from good to bad. It is not often that I get the pleasure of having a day off work and I was not about to let that one be ruined by an inconsiderate couple who was never taught Abalos 2 to share or take turns. Instead of letting it get to me, I tried my hardest to forget what had just happened and pretended that they had been there the entire time.