Prior to appointing counsel, what needs to be read out loud in open court? I think that the charges against the accused nee d to be read, a formal arrangement where the judge read the charges and informs the defendant of his/her rights. 2. What choices does Judge Fletcher have in appointing counsel for Slick Martin? He can appoint a public defender to Martin, which he doesn’t have to pay for or appoint counsel where he can pay
It appears that the employer intentionally disposed of the parts. The disposal of these parts may prejudice the client's ability to recover in any product liability lawsuits against the corporations involved in the manufacture, distribution, inspection, or servicing of the conveyor. • What section of Am.
The right to present evidence ensures that parties will receive a fair judgment pertaining to the facts surrounding the case. 5. The right to cross examination provides parties with the opportunity to confront opposing witnesses and evidence before an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) makes his decision (DeLeo, 2008). B. Informal 1.
QUESTION 1 SMITH/JOHNSON/DANFORTH/BUCHANAN The prosecution wants to introduce the following items into evidence: * The “Pay/Owe Ledger” of Danforth * Agent Buchanan’s Testimony of Sally’s reaction to a photo. * Officer Smith’s testimony of what Johnson told him regarding Danforth. Hearsay/Nonhearsay. Hearsay is an out of court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. LEDGERS FOUND IN DANDFORTH ‘S VAN - HEARSAY/HEARSAY EXCEPTION A search incident found a variety of drugs and other paraphernalia in Danforth’s van as well as a ledger, according to the facts, that document the amounts and types of drugs sold and to whom these drugs were sold as well as what monies were exchanged.
John has the option of requesting compensatory and punitive damages caused by discrimination form his employer. If he does not receive the type of justice he seeks with the court’s decision, he can file appeals. If he exhausts all of his appeals, his case may lead to the Supreme Court. His case can only make it this far by following all steps set forth by the EEOC. Conclusion The EEOC provides employees with an opportunity to have an independent investigator review possible discriminatory employment practices within a private organization.
IT550 Assignment Unit 1 Kaplan University As the digital age progresses, more and more business is conducted electronically. Symbiotically illegal activities of those that wish to prosper from security vulnerabilities will increase. Cybercrime can be motivated by a number of factors including terrorism. Cyberterrorism is any terrorist act that uses computers as the vehicle for their attack. Cyber terrorists can be motivated to target organizations that will result in the radical’s group to cause the most harm and/or receive the most attention for their party.
The deposition is recorded, and it most likely happens at the attorney’s firm without a judge being there. If the case does not get settled with a agreement, and it goes to the District Court in Confusion, the trial will be enclosed by the court trial courts of general jurisdiction. Any appeals that will be handled by the United States Court of Appeals. Any type of verdicts that are made and the court grants might be the final verdict and end for many cases because there is only one last court of appeals, and that is the United States Supreme
United State – 487 U.S. 99 (1988)” (Braswell v. United States, 487 U.S. 99) the Fifth Amendment would not apply. Braswell incorporated both companies and the “courts have recognized that corporations exist as a separate legal person” (Melvin, 2011, pg. 554). The details of corporate records are not privilege under the Fifth Amendment and “a corporation does not have a Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination” (Braswell v. United States, 487 U.S. 99). Conclusion In this case the courts make it clear that there is absolutely no instance where documents related to a corporation or any person connected to the corporation would be able to rely upon the Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination.
Pregent engaged in a scheme to defraud TechFab’s creditors, bankruptcy trustee and the bankruptcy court by transferring certain TechFab assets, including equipment and ongoing business, to a newly formed company. Pregent arranged for that new company to pay compensation for TechFab’s assets directly to himself, then filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy for TechFab to discharge its debts all while concealing the pre-bankruptcy transfer of assets and the agreement to pay compensation for those assets to Pregent. Furthermore, Pregent failed to disclose the transfers and compensation agreement in TechFab’s bankruptcy pleadings and during his testimony before a meeting of
Those that were employed by NutraCea and were found guilty of engaging in improper activities and were charged by the SEC were former CEO Bradley David Edson, Secretary Todd C. Crow, Senior VP Margie Adelman, Director of Financial Services Scott Wilkinson and Controller Joanne D. Kline. The SEC complaint filed in the Federal District Court of Arizona stated that Adelman, Edson, and Crow falsified the sales revenues and Wilkinson and Kline practiced improper accounting practices by recording those false revenues. When presented with the allegations within the complaint they were neither confirmed or denied and instead chose to settle down the matter which can only be approved by the U. S. District Court of Arizona. The complaint against Crow was more extensive. It was alleged that he violated the Exchange Act Rule, antifraud financial reporting, records, and