Lottery/the Crucible Essay

848 Words4 Pages
Irony in The Crucible and The Lottery

The Crucible by Arthur Miller and “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson are two stories that share many striking similarities. That of which include possessing the same underlying meanings in the plot and even resemblances to the same historic events, both of which can be tied in with some sort of irony; drama, situational, verbal, or otherwise. They each take on different variations of the same principles, such as mob mentality being detrimental to the greater benefit to society and irony playing a major factor in the plots of the two stories. Between the stories of The Crucible and “The Lottery” there are many relations of the irony used in the plots to grant ponderance, motivation, and feeling in the tone of the book. The stories utilize verbal irony to convey the sense of something more than the statement at face value, dramatic irony to feel the true ignorant and untrusting natures of the characters, and lastly situational irony as a medium for the former to glide through and provide the kick to the plot of the story.
Sarcasm and other verbal elements would be used in “The Lottery” and many more within the brilliant writing of The Crucible. It can be seen more commonly with the interactions between John Proctor and his wife, Elizabeth Proctor, where it is noted earlier in the book that he has cheated on her with Abigail Williams and now they face an uneasy relationship because of it. The book portrays an excellent scene of irony when John must recite his commandments:

Proctor: “... Thou shalt not bear false witness. [He is stuck. He counts backwards on his fingers, knowing one is missing] Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image.”
Hale: “You have said that twice, sir.”
Proctor, [lost]: “Aye. [he is flailing for it]”
Elizabeth, [delicately]: “Adultery, John.”

John forgets the one commandment which is
Open Document