Limit on Pets

606 Words3 Pages
There are many controversial opinions when it comes to the topic regarding the limit of pets in a residence. Many agree with letting the government dictate the number of pets, while others protest against the government. In my opinion, this ordinance is best for all residents. It keeps the abused pet count level to a minimum. The ordinance also keeps pets from going stray. It also restricts the disturbances to neighbors, and it prevents people becoming irresponsible . Nobody denies that irresponsible pet ownership is a serious issue. Animal overpopulation is a serious problem in this country. Every year, hundreds of thousands of stray cats and dogs are turned over to animal shelters. But an ordinance limiting the number of pets a person may own would go a long way towards solving the problem. There are several reasons an animal may go stray. Some of these same strays have distraught families who are desperately looking for them. These families are responsible pet owners who lost their pet due to an unfortunate accident. Perhaps their dog jumped over a fence after a rabbit, or their cat scooted out the front door when a visitor stopped by. However, most stray animals end up in shelters because of irresponsible pet owners. These people do not treat their animals as family members. They adopt pets without thinking of the money, time, and effort that is involved. Often these people do not properly confine or care for their pets, and they don’t think about how this affects their neighbors. They may, for example, allow their animals to roam the neighborhood freely, which is a situation that can prove annoying, frightening, or potentially dangerous to neighbors. A surprising number of these irresponsible pet owners will simply abandon their animals on the street when they prove to be too much of a hassle to feed or care for. It is because of these irresponsible pet
Open Document