Fearing a possible plot of revenge, Creon exiles Medea and her children from the city. After pleading for mercy, Medea is granted one day before she must leave, during which she plans to complete her ultimate goal which is to murder Creon, Glauce, and Jason. During that one day left in Corinth, Medea decides to confront Jason. She reminds him of all the actions she has done for him and how he has dishonored himself by abandoning the marriage. Jason accuses Medea of overreacting.
Emma plots and executes the murder of Loewenthal to avenge her father’s death. In the short story “Emma Zunz,” Jorge Luis Borges uses tone and characterization to show how the marginalization of Emma propels her to develop and perform the meticulous plot to avenge her father’s death. The marginalization of Emma is shown through the tone of the text. The tone of the short story is exposed right away. The first thing the reader learns is the death of the young girl’s father.
I will recommend a new business entity, and provide rationale to support my recommendation. Some example as well will be giving to support my recommendation. VII. Conclusion In this section I will be discussing every topic that was discuss in this essay a summary of the essay will be giving. The thesis statement will be enter into this section again and I will be able to give more examples of the laws of business.
Medea, by Euripedes. The tragedy starts with Jason’s betrayal to Medea, his Barberian wife, who to revenge herself kills her own children and Glauce, new wife of Jason. In the Exodos, Jason returns to his old house in the attempt to save his boys, but he learns by the chorus that they are already dead, murdered by Medea. The scene pursues with Jason’s anger towards his ex-wife and her manifestation of pleasure in seeing his desperation is evident throughout the text. POWER : The theme of objective power – free of a subjective judgement from the reader- is largely developed throughout the Exodos.
Jeremy wants to reach out to the producers with his article, to tell them that what they are doing is wrong. He appeals to pathos when he talks about the victims in the reality shows. He talks about a woman who committed suicide, because she felt guilty about mocking her sister’s appearance on the show “extreme makeover” where she could win a free plastic surgery. Jeremy also talks about a cast member of “Big Brother” who sued CBS in 2002 because another cast member with a criminal record held a knife to her throat. This makes the spectators of the reality show wonder why nobody helps the victims.
A crucial point that represents Eric’s greater ability to change is portrayed near the end of the play after the inspector has been un-covered as a fake. “We all helped kill her.” In contrast to the feelings of Mr.Birling, Mrs.Birling and Gerald, Eric argues the fact that whether or not the inspector was a fake – there was still a girl called Eva smith who had been in contact with the members of Birling family that died. So for the family to start celebrating over the fact that the inspector is a fake and continue with their old ways which can lead to the deaths of many other ‘Eva Smiths and John Smiths’ out there. He believes that they should change from their capitalist views and accept the socialist view – so that the lower class isn’t exploited by the ways of the upper class. To further express this point, Eric seems to be unwilling to just pretend that none of the blame is on him.
She told the officer that she was a bad mother and expected to be punished. This crime will unravel the reasons why a loving mother, of five, had drowned all of her children, tangled in issues of depression, religious fanaticism, and psychosis. Why would any mother murder all of her children? When Andrea was brought in for questioning she was asked “who killed your children” and she said “I killed them”. Then she was asked “why did you kill your children” and she replied “because I am a bad mother”.
Michelle Byrom: Death Row Inmate In 1999, Michelle Byrom plotted a murder with her son, Edward Byrom Jr., to kill her abusive husband, Edward Byrom Sr. After her son had killed Edward Byrom Sr., he fled and Michelle was arrested for the murder. Michelle was tried, was found guilty and sentenced to death by lethal injection. Despite repeated confessions from her son that he committed the murder, Michelle still remains on death row. In this case, justice has not prevailed because Michelle Byrom is held on death row for a crime her accomplice committed. Her accomplice is free from charges.
What would one expect of the personality of a farmhouse wife who has been accused of murdering her husband because she found him dead and didn’t notify the police? It is just such a women—a lonely housewife— Susan Glaspell portrays in this story. Or did Minnie Foster have reason for killing her husband? Glaspell’s "small feminist classic"(Bendel-Simso 291) raises many legal and ethical questions while offering a dilemma on pursing Justice and pursuing the Law. Critics believe that Glaspell, who based this story on a real murder trial in which women were not allowed to serve as jurors, created a jury of those female peers in her story to “mete out their own form of justice” (Cromie).
The District Attorney then proceeds to tell this author that the gang stated “we murdered him because we couldn’t find her. We wanted to draw her down here to kill her for putting away our homies.” Against the district attorney’s advice this author goes to the funeral under protection because she just has to be there to bury her fiancée. Nothing significant happens during the funeral and this author was taken back to her hotel room. The funeral occurred on Saturday and this author was to stay until Sunday evening for a group debriefing. Once back in her room this author got scared and decided to run.