The parents show that their not going to allow the child goofing off and they will be listened to. Study shows that children have more respect for their parents in the future if and when their spanked. I believe parents need to spank, and I have more respect for mine because they did. Spanking a child is also not abuse because the parent spanking the kid is teaching them right from wrong. A parent has to teach a kid what’s right from wrong so they can assure they won’t do it again.
Turley argued that violent toys offer advantages because they aid children in channelling their aggression and seen as a valuable vehicle to process violence. However he failed to address how this could help convince zero-tolerance parents who viewed violent toys as an encouragement of aggressive behaviours and violent attitude. Despite putting in reasonable effort in his claim of having a healthy dose of violence, the result would as undesirable if violence had been misinterpreted or mishandled such as in the case of the 1999 Columbine High School shootings. Turley should therefore be educating parents on guiding their children when playing with such violent toys and not exposing to children directly. While Turley provides sufficient amount of evidence from various professionals, the essence of the author’s original argument that violent toys should be seen as beneficial was lost in the midst of quoting the many opinions and research of other individuals.
Pornography helps us to free ourselves from the abstinent attitudes about sex that have long dominated our society. As for that, opponents believe that pornography is not harmful and should therefore be legally tolerated. I totally disagree with that statement as pornography causes people to have more negative attitudes towards women to engage in harmful behaviours like rape and child molestation. We can find pornography facilitates and child molestation in several ways. For example, pedophiles often prefer children close to puberty who are sexually inexperienced and use pornographic photos to demonstrate to their victims what they want them to do.
Existential angst about avoiding exercise?" and with the addition of "Haven't parents heard of discipline? A swift kick up the rear end?" that are specifically aimed towards parents, positions the audience to think that these new reports and considerations are a joke and instead we should be pointing the finger towards parents not towards what controls our children in today's society. The piece is persuading the audience through rhetorical questions in order to agree with her point of view.
Moore interviews an individual with the name of Matt Stone to illustrate how Stone feels about gun violence and people who access guns in America. Moore does not use an ironic or sarcastic tone when he interviews Stone because he wants to show him positively but letting his responses communicate for themselves. He shows Stone in a positive way because his answers are bold and truthful and does not show him as a gun believer. Stone states in the interview that teachers make students feel as if they do not do well in high school they will forever be a loser and have no career. He that suggested that instead of students taking their aggression out on other students, they can do other productive activities to help them get away from violence, which schools should be embracing instead of gun access to solve their problems.
As adults, the rights of children are always supposed to be in our best interest. The reason the ban of virtual child pornography was considered unconstitutional is because no children are actual being used, so “no harm, no foul.” What it does not seem to consider is the right to life and health of the children who may be harmed by this practice? What happens when a man or woman who watches virtual porn is no longer satisfied with just watching and not wants to act on their impulses? The right to life and health for any child then can be considered compromised. “Negative rights, allow us to make claims on what others should not do to us” (Burnor,Raley p.196) , and what other should not do is cause possible endangerment of any child.
We have to show our limits and guide our children in positive behavior so that we can avoid spanking or any other form of corporate punishment. As to me, hitting or spanking our children is not the best way to influence them in being well behaved. They would behave better if we don’t spank them just punish them in other ways of talk to them. Article 2 Patti Bokony & Teri Patrick, Spanking: What the Experts Say ; TIPS 07-B1 Summary Spanking is a form of corporate punishment, as it may not be as harsh as punching, kicking or burning. It is still considered some form or child abuse.
In that case, tough love becomes nearly meaningless. Rather than making the children feel uncomfortable you have to find the best parenting style of discipline. For some reason, the concept of tough love has been usually criticized as a parent’s excuse to bully their children, in that matter bullying teens could resolve in to using drugs. Some drug treatment programs use the words tough love to describe their approach on helping the children. But some people may take the meaning as cruel, but as a resolute of the program it is successful only by breaking down the motivation of the young person in treatment.
Thy can not question their government...or their rights. But not knowing about something does not keep us from questioning. All it does is keep us un-informed. Teenagers remain un-educated about things like STD's because some schools have banned the teaching of it. Is that keeping the students safe?
Random student drug testing is also actually angering parents and caregivers. It is felt that the parenting role has been taken away from the actual parents and given to strangers. Drug testing is something that, if had to be given, should be given to a child from their parent rather than to a student by their administrator. The book says that the testing would be helpful because parents who learn about their child’s drug abuse would be likely so seek help for their problem (Book Source?). This may be true, but if the parents are concerned, they should be the ones to test them, not the