After the accident it appeared that he had become someone completely different exhibiting behaviors that were opposite of his core personality. Contributions to Cognitive Psychology “I think therefore I am” this famous quote by Rene Descartes can easily sum up the human condition. However it raises the question “where does thought come from?” In the study of cognitive psychology the examination of the brain is essential to understanding how and where thought originates. Early on in the science of psychology two standard schools of thought prevailed, the holistic and the phrenology or the idea that cognitive capabilities are separated throughout the brain. Although both have something to offer neither can claim full victory over truth.
Motivation Theories Shivani Rathod PSY/230 14th March 2014 SHAREMAH BARLOW Motivation Theories Based on the studies I have read, I agree more with diversity theory, as we are all vastly differing from each other; our motives are individually based, yet may be similar in some, yet less likely to have many of the same types of motivations. In my opinion; I do not feel too many individuals would be motivated my aggression or sexuality which falls under the psychoanalytic theory, granted I am sure there may be a group who may be motivated in such a way. Humanistic theory is based more on self, there are many people with big egos, and however, I feel not enough to be a strong motivator for a large group of people to fall under. After
In American culture, direct eye contact translates into confidence, competence and honesty. On the contrary, in other cultures a direct eye contact with superiors may be considered as daring or disrespectful. Another important factor influencing eye contact is relative heights of the people involved in the interaction and the distance between the individuals. The height gives the taller person a benefit of position of control or power and requires the shorter person to maintain eye contact because of the lack of power over the interaction. Also the proximity of interacting parties also tends to enhance the importance and intensity of the eye behavior simply because one is more aware of eye contact at closer range.
Word count 2093 “A PERSONALISED INDUCTION WILL ALWAYS BE MORE EFFECTIVE” Discuss. Base your answer on theoretical concepts and techniques presented in class. In order to discuss the statement “A personalised induction will always be more effective” we first have to agree that inductions can be tailored specifically to individual clients. Based on the premise that the brain processes information received through our different senses, and we as individuals favour different translations of this information through different modalities as explained in the following essay, I would agree that creating an induction that allows for these translations of information, and tunes into a particular individual, will be more successful than simply applying a universal PMR. This might appear overly simplified taking the complex nature in which the brain processes information, but it is generally agreed that the brain takes information via a visual cortex, auditory cortex and an olfactory cortex.
Hence this concept stresses upon the differences between the right brain and the left brain which ultimately determines a person's nature. First of all it's important for us to understand the basic brain biology. A simplified mode of the human brain consists of many parts which include: * Brain stem, hind brain, mid brain and cerebellum * Limbic system, which consists of many specialist organs including Hypothalamus, hippocampus. * Cerebral cortex, which is the distinguishing feature of human brains. The cortex is divided into two hemispheres, left and right which are connected by a thick layer of cells called corpus callosum.
That is to say, being smart is not equal to having and using only one type of intelligence, but having all types of intelligences which include practical, social and emotional intelligences as well as using them effectively. On the other hand, the definition of human intelligence may not be a simple one as it cannot be confined to one’s responses to numerical and verbal tasks in IQ tests. Human intelligence is beyond IQ tests as Phil Yam points out. Human intelligence is the combination of various skills and abilities that would work even in real-life conditions. People’s life success and practical knowledge are also determining factors while measuring their intelligence because they need to possess survival skills when they encounter stressful and challenging situations.
law describes, theory explains * What is the difference between a scientific theory and a scientific hypothesis? theory is well tested, hypothesis is an educated guess * How are scientific theories, laws, and hypotheses similar? they all start with a hypothesis, kind of a step by step analysis * Why is evidence important in science? to support or refute a hypothesis * What happens if scientists discover new evidence that contradicts an accepted scientific hypothesis, theory, or law? it leads to modification of scientific
Expert Knowledge Acquisition Student Strayer University Professor Decision Support Management – CIS501 November 4, 2012 Expert Knowledge Acquisition “Most experts have mixed feelings about the knowledge acquisition process and goals. Some are proud and honored to be acknowledged and mined as an expert, whereas others claim their decision-making processes are much too complex to model and mimic. As an expert, how would you feel if you were approached by a KE?” What position for or against sharing one’s knowledge does one take when approached by a knowledge engineer (KE)? In using an expert system should be designed as a set of tools in the decision making process, “rather than as solution to a predetermined set of problems” (Butza, 2011). Science fiction of artificial intelligence leads to misconceptions about expert systems and their capabilities for “doing everything without human assistance” (Global Jaya International School, 2012).
The question that should be asked is what method should be chosen so that it will be the most cost and time effective? Small Groups VS Individual Expert as Problem Solving Small groups tend to surpass individual experts when alternative solutions are present. Due to the fact that small groups consist of multiple bodies, they can input there own specific experiences and unique knowledge into the task at hand thus coming up with an, if not better, answer than that of the individual. Group work causes less strain to the mind and well as it is a lot less time consuming. Typically higher quality work is present with multitudes of solutions.
Why are some people better than others at supporting their beliefs and actions with good reasons? Again, the answer seems obvious: Some people have more knowledge or are more eloquent than others. Still, two equally intelligent people can be equally articulate and knowledgeable, but not be equally good thinkers. If only one of them is thinking critically, that one will be better at analyzing and evaluating facts and opinions, sources and claims, options and alternatives. The critical thinker will be a better problem-solver and better decision-maker.