Learning Foreign Languages

377 Words2 Pages
Some children do not have natural ability for learning other languages. Therefore, they should not be forced to learn a foreign language. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Globalisation demands a common language for communication; as a result, foreign language, especially English, is now a compulsory school subject in most non-English speaking countries. However, some people say that the children who are not gifted for language learning should not be forced to learn a foreign language. I find this opinion invalid, for the following reasons. Natural ability, or talent, plays just a minor role in language learning. Linguists have shown that all normal children can master their first language during the first seven years of life, and that there is one and the same brain mechanism that controls language learning. That is, if a child can be fluent in his/her language, he/she can also be fluent in any other languages. Perhaps talent is required of those wishing to become lawyers or orators only. Another reason is the long-term benefits that foreign language learning brings. Learning a foreign language exposes children to another culture, raising their awareness of cultural diversity of the world. This would develop their tolerance to cultural differences, preparing them for multicultural work environment in the future. Also, foreign language skills would be essential for work as globalisation proceeds. All high-level job opportunities in the future would only be open to those with computer and international language skills. Those who argue against the teaching of foreign languages as a compulsory subject probably rely on the low rate of success of such program in some countries. However, other factors, not learners' natural ability, should be responsible for this, one of which is motivation for learning. Children are too young to see
Open Document