Leadership Style, Job Satisfaction

2603 Words11 Pages
Abstract This paper sets out to explore the link between the style of leadership adopted by managers and the job satisfaction of their subordinates. The findings indicated significant differences in job satisfaction based on the employees’ demographic characteristics. It was also found that the most prevalent style was democratic, but that once again style varied according to the managers’ demographic profile. While it is not possible from the data to claim a direct relationship between leadership style and job satisfaction, but neither is the data able to refute that assertion. Key Words: Leadership style, job satisfaction. Leadership Styles Bass (1990) defined leadership as a process of interaction among individuals and groups that includes a structured or restructured situation, members’ expectations and perceptions. Leadership can be explained as the ability of an individual to have power that focuses on how to establish directions by adapting forces (Go et al., 1996). From an organizational perspective, Schermerhorn (1999) believed that leading is a process used to motivate and to influence others to work hard in order to realize and support organizational goals, while Hersey et al. (2001) believed that leadership influences individuals’ behavior based on both individuals’ and organizational goals. Robbins (2001) defined leadership as the ability of an individual to influence the behavior of a group to achieve organizational goals. It is possible to conclude from these discussions that leadership is a group of phenomena, whereby leaders are distinctive from their followers, and can influence individuals’ activities to achieve set goals in their organizations. Leadership style is defined as the pattern of behaviors that leaders display during their work with and through others (Hersey and Blanchard, 1993). Miller et al. (2002) view leadership style

More about Leadership Style, Job Satisfaction

Open Document